Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stone Warrior Delights Experts (Celts)
BBC ^ | 12-5-2003 | Paul Rincon

Posted on 12/05/2003 5:20:19 PM PST by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 12/05/2003 5:20:20 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
Ping.
2 posted on 12/05/2003 5:20:58 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Origin Of The Celts - Caucasian, Not European
3 posted on 12/05/2003 5:37:37 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
Actually, the origin of all Europeans is the Caucasian area, but these had earlier come from Africa. This has been demonstrated by Y chromosome DNA analysis. (The Y chromosome is passed on unchanged from Father to son, except rare mutations arise every now and then in the chain and are passed on. These mutations act as markers to trace a current Y chromosome back up the chain).
4 posted on 12/05/2003 5:54:37 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
Geez, I always taught the celts were from Iberian peninsula in origin.

5 posted on 12/05/2003 5:56:36 PM PST by Smocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
Interesting
6 posted on 12/05/2003 6:09:17 PM PST by BenLurkin (Socialism is Slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; *Gods, Graves, Glyphs; abner; Alas Babylon!; Andyman; annyokie; bd476; BiffWondercat; ...
Gods, Graves, Glyphs
List for articles regarding early civilizations , life of all forms, - dinosaurs - etc.

Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this ping list.

7 posted on 12/05/2003 6:12:03 PM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
Gene Study Identifies 5 Main Human Populations
8 posted on 12/05/2003 6:18:43 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
That's interesting. It's a static look at this time, whereas the Y-C study is a historical look at the races as they migrated and evolved from the African bushman, who was the forefather of us all.

I believe most of the world's population, including Amerinds, came from the Caucasian area via different paths. Exceptions are the Australian aborigines and a group in India.

9 posted on 12/05/2003 6:31:44 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam
"The "Warrior of Lattes" is described in the scholarly journal Antiquity".......


as the founder of Starbucks?
10 posted on 12/05/2003 8:32:33 PM PST by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
I don't think we have enough data to draw those conclusions. Read the article linked below.

Stranger In A New Land (Archaeology)

11 posted on 12/05/2003 8:50:18 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam
The migration I'm referring to took place about 25-50,000 yrs ago (I forget the more-exact number), long after the period your article refers to. The Y-chromosome technique doesn't go past that time because it's based on comparing DNA between living men. The tracking back using Y-chromosome markers goes back from Europeans to the Caucasus to the Bushmen in Africa who use clicks to communicate (they don't look like equatorial Africans, but have faces with hints of Kurd and eskimo in them). If you do the same thing with Amerinds, the track goes back to Siberia and then Caucasus, again.

An Ice Age at that time caused a major drought in Africa and thus migration through the Middle East to the Caucasus where our ancestors stayed for a while, before spreading out into Europe, Siberia (and thence N. America), India, etc.

We are all related to the Bushmen, but of course that doesn't mean there weren't other hominids before the bushmen living around the world. Clearly, there were. Their genes disappeared, however, either because their progeny ran out of sons (e.g., my Y is going to disappear since I only had daughters) or they couldn't compete with the bushmen. The latter is most likely, tho', since a DNA study done on the matriarchal path also leads to one female bush-person (!) as our common ancestor.

12 posted on 12/06/2003 8:29:14 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
Some support for your ideas?

African Click Language 'Holds Key To Origins Of Earliest Human Speech'

13 posted on 12/06/2003 9:23:10 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam
blam -- the site you've posted has a tendency of posting speculation -- interesting reading, but speculation nonetheless. It's punctuated by too much of 'I think's. No hard evidence and too much credence is given to myths in their entirety. For instance, the talkg about Aesir and Vanir is patently incorrect. The Aesir and Vanir are derivative of an old Aryanic religion and finds echoes in Hinduism and the pre-Zoroastrian Irani religions.
14 posted on 02/16/2004 8:06:21 AM PST by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
An Ice Age at that time caused a major drought in Africa and thus migration through the Middle East to the Caucasus where our ancestors stayed for a while, before spreading out into Europe, Siberia (and thence N. America), India, etc.

That's a very credible theory and makes a lot of sense -- the Ice Age would also have created the Sahara desert cutting off what would become the non-Afroid groups. Those which remained in the Caucasus would have been seperated from the Mongoloid group, again because of the Ice age in Siberia.
15 posted on 02/16/2004 8:08:40 AM PST by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: expatpat; blam
Expat's theories do make a lot of sense. also, when you think about it, modern day Afroids can be distinguished as Bantu from West Africa and Bushmen and Ethiopians fromt he horn of Africa. The Ethiopians are tall, slim, and don't have the pronounced Afroid features -- flat noses etc. so could be closely related to the Bushmen and to Caucasoids (or then again it could be that since Ethiopia-Somalia is so close to Egypt-Sumeria-india they would have some racial interaction)
16 posted on 02/16/2004 8:11:46 AM PST by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
You're very kind, but too kind in ascribing the theory to me. It is not mine, but due to some folks (I don't remember any names) who did Y-chromosome marker tracking in many places in the world. There was a program on PBS about it, which is where I heard it.

It works like this: The Y chromosome is passed from father to son unaltered, since the mother has no Y. However, occasionally, a mutation occurs, and after a string of identical Y chromosomes in succeeding males, there arises one with one small change in it (a marker). This in turn is propagated through many generations until another mutation occurs.

In this way you can track back the chromosomes for two men in different countries to a point where the later different sets of markers do not exist and both men share a common male ancestor. They tracked native Amerinds back to Siberia, then back to Central Asia near Uzhbekastan, (and Europeans back to the same area), and from Central Asia back to this one Bantu tribe in Africa.

17 posted on 02/16/2004 1:10:32 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
Gene Study Identifies 5 Main Human Populations
18 posted on 02/16/2004 6:18:48 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blam
Thanks, interesting. Of course, the 'markers' in this study are different from the mutation markers I was talking about.

Regarding the posted article as a whole, some folks are really uptight about accepting racial differences. Of course, these are the same people who want to list race on the census form and use race in university admissions.

19 posted on 02/16/2004 6:34:51 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Smocker
Geez, I always taught the celts were from Iberian peninsula in origin.

No. They had moved into the Iberian peninsula but did not originate there.

Originally, the Celts conquered northern and central Iberia. The Iberians then reoccupied what is now the Basque region cutting off the Iberian Celts from their Celtic cousins in Gaul.


20 posted on 02/16/2004 7:21:06 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson