Cruel Joke or Medical Anomaly?

UM List ^ | Tim Wilkins

[xzins]

Cruel Joke or Medical Anomaly? Proponents of same-sex "marriage" owe us an answer

by Tim Wilkins

(part of this article may be unsuitable for young readers)

The Physiology of Mankind

"Love and marriage, love and marriage, go together like a horse and carriage. This I tell ya, brother, you can't have one without the other." Neither can you have a marrriage without a man and a woman, unless you’re the Massacheutts Supreme Court–to whom I ask the following question.

Why is one hundred percent of the homosexual population physiologically heterosexual?

When I asked that question before a group of university students, one said the question contained a presumption–that homosexuals were physiologically heterosexual. I am always open to differing views, yet he offered no explanation. In postmodernism one need not waste syllables buttressing one’s views—verbalizing a belief automatically makes it factual. Hubert Humphrey said, "The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously." The student reminded me of a man who, on another occasion, steadfastly disagreed when I said that at conception the man determines the sex of the child. "Every man has a right to his own opinion, but he does not have a right to his own set of facts."

My statement regarding human physiology is neither sexist nor politically motivated. It is a fact.

Look at this statement from two perspectives—first, a theological perspective and second, a medical perspective.

If in fact God creates some people as homosexuals, we must conclude that God has played a cruel joke on them. He has engineered their minds and emotions for attraction to the same-sex and yet created their physiology to be in direct opposition to that attraction. Such an act would be malicious. Only a sadistic god would conceive and conduct such a horrific deed.

Look at the statement from a medical perspective! If homosexuality is a naturally occurring phenomenon—a legitimate alternative to Mankind’s expression of sexuality, we would have to conclude that homosexuals bear severe physiological anomalies.

I am aware the previous conclusion may infuriate some; few things anger people more than uttering a logical thought. Truth has always angered people—which is why some wise sage cautioned, "Tell the truth and run!"

But alas I do not believe the conclusion because I do not believe homosexuality to be moral.

If for no other reason, homosexuality is illegitimate in that it is anatomically unsuitable.

The Ingenuity of the Physical Body

Regardless from where you believe Mankind originated, we must agree that the human body is the work of a genius. How do we account for tear ducts that automatically flush the eye when a microscopic grain of sand invades them? Who can fathom how an arm or leg produces chill bumps, which in turn raises the hairs on those limbs in order to reduce the amount of body heat being expended by a cold wind?

These mysteries of the human body include libido. When sexually aroused, the woman’s body changes through a series of preparations. Her vagina lengthens for a distinct reason. Her body, equipped with Bartholin’s gland, produces lubrication for a distinct reason. More intricate than any scientific invention ever conceived or constructed, the outer third of her vagina swells with blood for a distinct reason. The Psalmist was correct--we are "fearfully and wonderfully made." (Psalm 139:14)

But these incredible workings lead us to another question which refuses to be ignored--why would such physiological changes occur in homosexual women when the changes do nothing to assist sexual interaction?

One cannot simply dismiss the question as irrelevant. If God makes no mistakes, and He does not, what accounts for this dichotomy among homosexuals? If homosexuality is "natural" why the inappropriate and unnecessary body changes?

No legitimate answer exists. God desires each of us to become personally what He has created us to be physiologically, biologically and anatomically.

The Universality of Sin

The answer to why homosexuality exists is sin—a universal condition unconfined to homosexuals; one hundred percent of the world’s population are sinners. "…for all have sinned and come short of God’s glory." (Romans 3:23)

And the answer to sin is Jesus Christ who, by the way, performed His first miracle during the marriage of a man and a woman.

The proponents of homosexual "marriage" appear to have all the answers. What say ye? Is this phenomenon a cruel joke or a medical anomaly?

[coincheck]

thank you for stating the obvious. physiologically and biologically we are created for a role in procreation. men are not designed to accept a pen!$ and women are. when used improperly, a pandoras box of illness and disease is opened. and life expectancy is shortened. and yes it is sin.
coincheck

[coincheck]

you seem to be arguing(sp) that GOD does not exist because He can not be seen, felt, or measured. yet you use his words against those who know the context in which they were given in order to silence them.

the fact that the earth has an atmosphere that supports life, and is the only planet in this solar system (and the entire universe) that does is proof of intelligent design evolution, which is the only other theory, does not hold water(scientific fact).

a watch is made by someone, an air plane is made by someone these are complicated things. the human body is far and away more complicated than anything on this planet, and was made by someone more intelligent and powerful than anyone on this globe. this is truth, regardless if you belive it or not.

read the bible and check to see that GOD has given us something to prove that he exists, He foretold future events from antiquity to prove that he exists.
if that is not enough for you, then nothing but His appearing to you will be enough. coincheck

[scripter]

And you consider someone asking you questions to be to extreme.

That's just more misdirection. Your question demonstrated one of two things:

1. your profound ignorance
2. that you never read a single link I posted to you

Had you even a hint of what you were talking about and with whom, you never would have asked that question. Let's let everybody know exactly how profound your ignorance is here. You asked me:

Are you saying that there was not homosexuality during the time of Ancient Greece.

You asked me that question in response to my post where where I gave you a link to the following:

Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links

Had you actually clicked on that link you would have seen nearly 500 articles on the subject of homosexuality that yours truly compiled. I've studied each article, some of them many, many times, and am very much aware of a plethora of issues on homosexuality. So pardon me if in demonstrating your profound ignorance you asked me a very stupid question where the answer should be obvious to anybody who can read.

[scripter]

I'm well aware of the fact that you don't like it when someone points out your inconsistency. Your misdirection will not distract from your inconsistency.

[scripter]

If someone is discussing on a thread and tells someone to butt out, they should be Freepmailing instead. This thread is a party line!

Indeed! We see that someone doesn't like it when we point out his inconsistency.

[little jeremiah]

(Willful) ignorance is its own reward.

Or, None so blind as those who don't want to see.

Good night to you!

[Revelation 911]

See port 274.


.......yawn

[Revelation 911]

PCJ: The NT yes. The OT no. The OT is a story unto itself.

Rev 911 ...nevermind all that prophecy stuff in the OT LOL

insert silence or sound of clock ticking

[Paul C. Jesup]

Pride leads to rebelliousness which leads to illicit acts, including same sex acts.

Actually pride leads more often to power-grabbes and enslavement of humanity.

By the way, you still think of the mortal sin, lust.

You refuse to even admit the differences between the seven deadly sins.

It really sad when religion in this country has declined to the point where people believe homosexuality (itself) is a worse than the seven deadly sins.

[Paul C. Jesup]

I thought you said, "Farewell for now." Guess not.

[scripter]

I thought you said, "Farewell for now." Guess not.

What part of for now do you not understand?

Lurkers, see post 343.

[little jeremiah]

Answer the two questions!

[Paul C. Jesup]

Scripter, has to first answer my questions.

[Paul C. Jesup]

You call me ignorant, but it is YOU who refuses to answer my questions.

Here is the main one: What is your definition of "help"?

If you continue to refuse to answer this question and continue to insult me, it will only show the rest of the people on FR how much of a hypocrite you are.

[Paul C. Jesup]

By the way, the "Homosexual Agenda" as you call it is actually the "Socialist (more corrupt government) Agenda" using homosexuality to hide it's real goals. The "Socialist Agenda" could care les about homosexuals. But you are to damn dense to realize that.

[scripter]

If you continue to refuse to answer this question and continue to insult me, it will only show the rest of the people on FR how much of a hypocrite you are.

I'm perfectly fine with letting everyone read this thread as it is, especially

Post 343

[scripter]

Now is the time a bozo filter would be a great feature of this site.

[little jeremiah]

All you need to do is click on the link and find out what kind of help. You are being not only disruptive and rude, but you are personally insulting a dedicated and honorable Freeper who I consider a friend. I am sick of your anger, dissimulation and - yes - arrogance. If you can't debate in a minimally respectful and honest way, I don't think you belong on this forum.

[Paul C. Jesup]

You defect the question, not answering it.

[Paul C. Jesup]

You deflecting the question, not answering it.