Let's try to imagine that instead of Rush, the person whose doctors records were being searched was one of the Today Show's liberal faves.
The liberal would be treated as a returning hero, a role model and an inspiration for millions of Americans. [By now he would undoubtedly have announced the formation of a charitable foundation, and the show would have broadcast the web page and phone number to help solicit donations.]
Any investigation of such a person would be cast as a McCarthyite witch hunt and attempted character assassination. The name of John Ashcroft and the dread Patriot Act would be darkly invoked.
Instead, Rush is described as facing "serious charges," and the fishing expedition against him described as a "specific subpoena."
The liberal spin machine never stops whirring.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Excellent analysis. I agree completely.
62 posted on
12/05/2003 6:14:52 AM PST by
Skooz
(We keep you alive to serve this ship. Row well, and live.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Rushbo was a reassuring light in eight years of Clintonista darkness ... he's still the best spokesman for conservatives, head and shoulders above others that have emerged in recent years. However, if you do what Rush does for a living you had better be above reproach in your own personal life ... or enemies will find the chink in your armor and exploit it. That is exactly what is happening now ... for that Rush has no one else to blame but himself. It was incredible folly on his part to allow himself to be put in this situation. He will pay a steep price in credibility with his listening audience, he may never fully recover career wise.
63 posted on
12/05/2003 6:16:34 AM PST by
BluH2o
To: governsleastgovernsbest
If I had Rush's resources, the Palm Beach County DA would have his personal life turned inside out. That's the Roy Black interview I want to see.
64 posted on
12/05/2003 6:18:13 AM PST by
Let's Roll
(Support our brave troops as they protect us from evil.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Lets imagine it was you or me.
We'd already be in jail.
Rush is getting special treatment, but it is mostly beneficial. He has a good lawyer and the money to keep him on retainer, but Rush is getting special treatment and it is to his benefit.
Of course, you are right. If this Kommunist Katie Kouric, she'd get a party and there would be no talk about prosecution.
65 posted on
12/05/2003 6:21:08 AM PST by
Little Ray
(When in trouble, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
After years on the Free Republic, I've come to the conclusion that America has
way too many laws. The government is capable of gigging anybody for anything. Many Americans would be surprised to find out that they themselves are unprosecuted felons.
We tipped over the edge with the Lautenberg Amendment, and it's been going downhill at a faster and faster pace since then. It's beginning to appear that many prosecutions are for the purpose of revenue enhancement, and others are for political gain.
67 posted on
12/05/2003 6:23:52 AM PST by
an amused spectator
(1,700 innocent civilians saved by United States troops in November, 2003)
To: All
Note that an hour or so after this thread was posted, the AP has put out a story reporting on Black's appearance on The Today Show:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1034492/posts Not to toot one's own horn [well, perhaps a subdued note or two!], but for the fastest, freshest take on liberal bias on The Today Show, stay tuned to Free Republic!
To: governsleastgovernsbest
bump
73 posted on
12/05/2003 6:36:12 AM PST by
GOPJ
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Let's try to imagine what would happen if someone (an independent prosecutor, for example) managed to get Bill Clinton's medical records. The trumpets would peal from the media towers in New York and privacy legislation would already be written.
76 posted on
12/05/2003 6:45:12 AM PST by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I have a theory that I put together just after Rush went to rehab, and some of the recent events seem to fit.
I have speculated that the "cleaning lady" bit is without merit, and that she may even have sold Rush's private information on order to take him down. It would be easy to obtain Rush's prescription drug usage by opening the medicine cabinet and taking notes while cleaning. Given this, it would not be a long stretch for her to add that she sold him medication. If she was hired to "expose" him she would have to go to authorities in order to protect herself from prosecution while still bringing him down. It also makes no sense to me that he would buy illegally when he has the legal means to obtain the drugs he needs (or wants).
I suspect this is where the investigation is now. Since the prosecutor has nothing of substance with her he is now fishing for other ways to bolster this non-case.
One last note; I have a close friend in Virginia who has a very messed-up back from an auto accident. He uses oxicontin daily, and works with a doctor who is an expert in pain management. This doctor has told him that pain management is a relatively new field of medicine with many misconceptions. He claims that one of the biggest problems for patients that continue to suffer pain if that they are under medicated.
77 posted on
12/05/2003 6:48:32 AM PST by
70times7
(An open mind is a cesspool of thought)
To: governsleastgovernsbest; ConservativeMan55
ping
Lando
83 posted on
12/05/2003 7:03:16 AM PST by
Lando Lincoln
(I'm thinkin', I'm thinkin'....)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
How about Winona Ryder? They caught, her red handed, with prescription medications from different doctors. Did they continue the investigation? Think not. However, shopping Drs. is against the law.
87 posted on
12/05/2003 7:09:18 AM PST by
Hildy
To: governsleastgovernsbest
...the abuse of prescription drugs that has killed at least 2,000 Floridians, most in the past two years.
Though state law recognizes that others besides the victim may share blame for these deaths, authorities seldom hold anyone but the victims accountable.
Pain patients and doctor "shoppers" who amass pills and illegally sell some for quick cash often aren't tracked down and prosecuted.
Abuses of prescription drugs `demand response' from government agencies
Posted December 3 2003
South Florida Sun-Sentinel
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/southflorida/sfl-drugmain4dec03.story
97 posted on
12/05/2003 7:46:37 AM PST by
Lockbox
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Continued Black "They're trying to publicly embarrass him and ruin his radio program. He shouldn't be treated differently because he's Rush Limbaugh."Mr. Black really needs to step up the rhetoric here. I would suggest that this is about PAYBACK from liberals and Dems. Their interest is not in seeing that the law be followed (re:Clinton) but, that the real motive here is taking Rush out of the political dialogue before next years election and, PAYBACK for the damage he has done to the RATS and their media bretheren.
98 posted on
12/05/2003 7:47:12 AM PST by
capydick
(Where did all these Useful Idiots come from?)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Holt: "You say this is a fishing expedition, but the subpoena is specific." In a word ... Yep!
If this was a liberal .. these so-called media/press people would be screaming that Ashcroft was out to get them
If Rush's medical records should be public record ... then about about they release Clinton's medical records
103 posted on
12/05/2003 8:24:07 AM PST by
Mo1
(House Work, If you do it right , will kill you!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Roy Black & Mark Geragos (whacko jacko) sure are sounding an awful lot alike. They're trying to ruin my client's career.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I have said this before but I will ad it here:
They are desperate to find some charge to place Rush outside the jurisdiction of Drug Court. A drug court case would only achieve a dismissal and treatment.
The financial crimes department of the State Attorney's offices is spearheading the rush "investigation".
They Palm Beach Democrats want a full criminal court case not a drug court case. They will charge in that direction with that goal regardless how flimsy the evidence.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Black: "Of all the millions of people addicted to painkillers, have you ever seen their doctors being subpoenaed?"I have. The times I've seen it, though, the target of the inquiry was the physician or physicians involved.
Rush isn't going to lose his show over this. His audience understands what happened to him and how he became an addict. Is there any evidence that any great number of his fans have left him over this?
115 posted on
12/05/2003 9:45:14 AM PST by
Scenic Sounds
(Pero treinta miles al resto.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Your comments make good solid sense. I wonder how the snotty libs reacted to the news of JFK's drug usage and apparent dependency?
Now I wonder if one of the reasons Bill Clinton kept his medical records a secret is because he has used painkiller drugs as well among other things? I often wonder how he was able to endure knee surgery without any sort of painkiller if we are to believe his so-called media hyped bravery?
148 posted on
12/06/2003 7:45:20 PM PST by
harpo11
(Foolish Democrat Leaders Have Crumbled in Abject Moronity as they Retreat From the War on Terrorism.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Unfortunately, Rush is damaged goods and may wind up serving time. His situation is a hugh boost for the new Liberal radio/media network being launched and he, along with Bush, will be prime topics 24/7 on the Liberal talk shows. He did this to himself and to us at the same time.
149 posted on
12/06/2003 8:03:40 PM PST by
Consort
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson