Replies

I told you I was wrong on the threats and extortion allegations; honestly, I don't remember what I heard or read or misread that put that idea in my head, but I was unable to find it again. That's why I cheerfully - though sheepishly - admitted my error.

Yes, there is rank hypocrisy on the side of the liberals. But it would be equally hypocritical for conservatives to insist that the liberals - on the one hand - enforce the law against their own; and on the other hand insist that they - the GOP - should not be prosecuted, especially on the basis that it is not enforced anyway.

And the 10-30 percent undecided (as distinct from independents) are going to support...well, that's why they are undecided. THEY are the ones who are up for grabs. The hard-core dems will never, ever support a conservative or a republican; they are lost and the GOP should not waste its time with them. The hard-core Republicans are safely in the conservative/GOP camp. But those that are questioning, waivering, not sure, undecided are the ones that need to be targeted.

Dean is nothing more than an old-school liberal with populist leanings with nothing to offer. He's leading now because frankly, he IS the best candidate in the dem field, but that is more an indictment of the democrat field of losers than an endorsement of him. Hilary has got to be salivating. Dean also looks a little like Leslie Nielson.

I still think the whole matter re Rush will be quietly dropped.

You say: "Yes, there is rank hypocrisy on the side of the liberals. But it would be equally hypocritical for conservatives to insist that the liberals - on the one hand - enforce the law against their own; and on the other hand insist that they - the GOP - should not be prosecuted, especially on the basis that it is not enforced anyway."

You keep saying this again and again, but that is not what we are talking about. You don't even mention that fact that according to Dershowitz, who has no reason to lie for Rush, this law normally goes unenforced. It seems it is being enforced on Rush because he is a conservative. This is what makes me think you are a liberal shill. There was another thread calling into question the credibility of the Democratic state attorney. Anyway, if you have any evidence normally enforced against liberals, please show it, or cease and desist.

In my last post to you I meant to say:

"If you have any evidence THAT THE LAW IS normally enforced against liberals, please show it, or cease and desist."

As for Dean. He is surely not the best the Dems have. He is just filled with the most hate, and is the most anti-American, anti-Bush, pro-UN of any of the non-joke candidates. That is perfect for the hardcore-liberal-Dem primary voters.

Besides, Dean had nothing bad to say, then or now, about Clinton for saying the same things about Iraq's WMD as Bush back in 1997, when Clinton bombed Iraq on impeachment day, and then simply left with the inspectors. According to you, the Independents make their decisions based on who they think is hypocritical. Therefore, they won't vote for Dean, right? LOL.

Hillary is too much of a divisive figure to win nationally.