To: Cacophonous
In my last post to you I meant to say:
"If you have any evidence THAT THE LAW IS normally enforced against liberals, please show it, or cease and desist."
As for Dean. He is surely not the best the Dems have. He is just filled with the most hate, and is the most anti-American, anti-Bush, pro-UN of any of the non-joke candidates. That is perfect for the hardcore-liberal-Dem primary voters.
Besides, Dean had nothing bad to say, then or now, about Clinton for saying the same things about Iraq's WMD as Bush back in 1997, when Clinton bombed Iraq on impeachment day, and then simply left with the inspectors. According to you, the Independents make their decisions based on who they think is hypocritical. Therefore, they won't vote for Dean, right? LOL.
Hillary is too much of a divisive figure to win nationally.
134 posted on
12/07/2003 8:35:02 AM PST by
j.cam
To: j.cam
No Dean is not the best the Dems have, but he's the best (a vastly relative term) of the bunch that have declared for the Presidency.
And while I think Hilary is evil (not a term I use lighlty), and agree she is too divisive nationally, don't be surprised to see her make a serious run. People and votes can be bought, elections can be rigged. Hell, it's how she wound up in the Senate. As we all know, rules and laws mean nothing to the Clintons.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson