Replies

In my last post to you I meant that I don't know how you came up with threats and extortion, you did explain the bribery though I disagree.

As for hypocrisy, I don't see how anyone could claim hypocrisy if the law is usually unenforced like Dershowitz said, and if the state attorney who is a Democrat is only enforcing it against Limbaugh because he is a conservative.

Who are the 30 percent independents going to vote for, Dean? You think they are suicidal and want to hand our national security over to France, a country that can't even secure itself? ;-)

I told you I was wrong on the threats and extortion allegations; honestly, I don't remember what I heard or read or misread that put that idea in my head, but I was unable to find it again. That's why I cheerfully - though sheepishly - admitted my error.

Yes, there is rank hypocrisy on the side of the liberals. But it would be equally hypocritical for conservatives to insist that the liberals - on the one hand - enforce the law against their own; and on the other hand insist that they - the GOP - should not be prosecuted, especially on the basis that it is not enforced anyway.

And the 10-30 percent undecided (as distinct from independents) are going to support...well, that's why they are undecided. THEY are the ones who are up for grabs. The hard-core dems will never, ever support a conservative or a republican; they are lost and the GOP should not waste its time with them. The hard-core Republicans are safely in the conservative/GOP camp. But those that are questioning, waivering, not sure, undecided are the ones that need to be targeted.

Dean is nothing more than an old-school liberal with populist leanings with nothing to offer. He's leading now because frankly, he IS the best candidate in the dem field, but that is more an indictment of the democrat field of losers than an endorsement of him. Hilary has got to be salivating. Dean also looks a little like Leslie Nielson.

I still think the whole matter re Rush will be quietly dropped.