Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/04/2003 1:58:49 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Pokey78
Hey Hack! Put any extra DFC's on your website lately?
2 posted on 12/04/2003 2:02:32 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Regardless of all this, does Hackworth have any bright ideas on how he thinks we should eradicate Al Qaeda?

The criticism alone is not that helpful without alternative solutions, assuming he is right, which I am not, yet.
3 posted on 12/04/2003 2:03:19 PM PST by Sam Cree (democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Like McCain, Hack peaked very early in life.

I'll just say I appreciate his military service, and leave it at that.

I really do appreciate it.

4 posted on 12/04/2003 2:05:24 PM PST by dead (I used to believe in a lot of things. All of it! Now I believe only in dynamite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
With friends like this, who needs enemies.
6 posted on 12/04/2003 2:07:53 PM PST by RobertM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
I also notice that Hack has recently changed his toon on Wesley Clark, calling him "the Perfumed Prince" back in 1999, but today calling him "insightful."

For some reason, Hackworth has a bee up his butt about Rumsfeld. It seems personal. Plus, we have to remember that Hackworth now makes his living as a talking head on cable. I would guess that he believes he better positions himself if he is one of the lone voices of contrarian perspective in a sea of other military experts who back this President and what we're doing in Iraq. He reminds me a little bit of Larry Klayman...Once Clinton was out of office, his only way to keep his gig was to start appealing to the Bush haters. It's all about distinguishing yourself. If this is the case, while he is a great military hero, I have little respect for him as a TV commentator.

7 posted on 12/04/2003 2:11:00 PM PST by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
I will continue to post the following whenever Col. Hackworth ventures out to comment. From the autobiographical military history, In the Company of Heroes, by Michael J. Durant (CWO4, Ret.), Night Stalker pilot and POW in Mogadishu, p. 351:

I was stunned and infuriated when self-described military hero Colonel David Hackworth attacked me in the press.

He accused me not only of "ersatz" heroism but of having spilled my guts to the enemy while in captivity--without any substantiating information to back up his claim. I didn't mind people speaking their piece, but Hackworth had sent letters to the editors of my hometown newspapers in both Clarkville, Tennessee, and Berlin, New Hampshire.

I had no idea what had spurred this very personal attack, but I was infuriated. At the time, had I run into him, I would have choked him. I responded to his rantings with my own letter to the editor, wondering why a man who considered himself a fine example of military leadership would chastise a fellow soldier in public, and challenged him to debate the issue. Shortly afterward, I received a postcard from Hackworth, claiming that he "didn't have the time" to discuss it with me. I was furious. He clearly had the time to rip me apart in public, but not to face me man-to-man.

Yet when things like this happened, I could only assume that some men could only bolster their self-worth by diminishing the deeds of others. I did not consider myself a hero, just a soldier who had done his best under difficult circumstances. Most of the true heroes I had ever known were dead. The rest of us were just survivors with medals.


8 posted on 12/04/2003 2:14:22 PM PST by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
"in too many cases, if the insurgents bait us and goad us into leveling buildings and homes, the people inside will then hate us (even if they did not before) and we have created more recruits for the guerrillas."

I wasn't aware that there were any residents of Samarra that didn't hate us. If I'm wrong about this then it would be counterproductive to shoot up the place, but if I'm right then it makes sense to instill some fear in the populace.

These are Sunni Arabs. If they hate us already they should fear us as well.
10 posted on 12/04/2003 2:15:32 PM PST by SBprone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
The ROE [rules of engagement] under 'Iron Fist' is such that the US soldiers are to consider buildings, homes, cars to be hostile if enemy fire is received from them (regardless of who else is inside). It seems to many of us this is more an act of desperation LOGIC!
12 posted on 12/04/2003 2:19:24 PM PST by chudogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
That email from "A Combat Leader" sounds fairly legitimate, but contains no specific information not already known from press accounts.
14 posted on 12/04/2003 2:20:30 PM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
'"Hack, most of the casualties were civilians, not insurgents or criminals as being reported." ... many people firing from rooftops or alleys that looked like civilians, not the Feddayeen "'

Oh, if by "civilians" he means people shooting at our troops, then I suppose he does think many of those killed were "civilians" LOL!

I doubt that a "battle commander" would call un-uniformed people shooting at him in an ambush "civilians", but I'm no expert.

15 posted on 12/04/2003 2:22:10 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Colonel Hackworth, 72, described the US Defence Secretary as "an arrogant asshole".

Well, with all due respect, It takes one to know one.

19 posted on 12/04/2003 2:24:29 PM PST by ladyinred (The Left have blood on their hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Does anyone know why Hackworth retired as a colonel? Just curious.
21 posted on 12/04/2003 2:29:56 PM PST by Ex-Dem ([N]o [B]alance in [C]overage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
All I know about "Hack" is, I'm glad that SOB moved out of Montana.

I was a fan of his at one time, but after spending alot of time on his website, I soon discovered that he is nothing more than a self grandizing blowhard.

Don't offer Criticism Hack unless you also offer a solution.

As an Army Officer you SHOULD know that.
24 posted on 12/04/2003 2:38:20 PM PST by Leatherneck_MT (Those who do not accept peaceful change make a violent bloody revolution inevitable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
I would feel great if all the people we killed were all enemy guerrillas, but I can't say that. We are probably turning many Iraqi against us and I am afraid instead of climbing out of the hole, we are digging ourselves in deeper."

A Combat Leader

Or Combat Leader, many Iraqis may conclude the guerrillas are bad and turn against the terrorists. Lets say it's a wash.

25 posted on 12/04/2003 2:38:57 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Hack is a crank. The old guy who stands at the back of the City Council (or School Board or Volunteer Fire Department) meeting and sarcastically points out how those in charge are screwing everything up. Cranks come in two forms, those who have never accomplished anything and are bitter about it, and those who used to accomplish a lot but have been passed by -- and are bitter about it. Hack is the second type of course, but these days he is no more than a crank none the less.
27 posted on 12/04/2003 3:11:36 PM PST by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
"Goddamn. You're Colonel Hackworth. You're the hot shit dude who tells it like it is."

That he does,,,,like it or not!

28 posted on 12/04/2003 3:43:57 PM PST by SCDogPapa (In Dixie Land I'll take my stand to live and die in Dixie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
The ROE [rules of engagement] under 'Iron Fist' is such that the US soldiers are to consider buildings, homes, cars to be hostile if enemy fire is received from them (regardless of who else is inside). It seems to many of us this is more an act of desperation ...

Far from being an act of desperation, it sends a very relevant message: "Fail to turn in the insurgents, and you can die alongside them."

30 posted on 12/04/2003 4:56:46 PM PST by PsyOp ( Citizenship ought to be reserved for those who carry arms. - Aristotle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
bttt
31 posted on 12/05/2003 5:57:21 AM PST by Deadeye Division
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813
self bump for later
32 posted on 12/05/2003 12:54:54 PM PST by jmc813 (Help save a life - www.marrow.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Hackworth's a military misery magnet. He's also very effeminate for a macho war hero, IMO.
33 posted on 12/05/2003 2:05:41 PM PST by arasina (I can't believe I said that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson