[Fearless Flyers]

If the Governor had any balls he would have introduced a few new laws instead of infringing on the children’s freedoms.

1)
Any minors targeted with harassment or intimidation during legal hunting seasons, by protesters opposed to hunting will understand they are in a life threatening situation and should be expected to use deadly force to protect their self’s.

2)
A 50 yard set back will be instituted between protesters opposed to hunting and any land that is deemed a legal kill zone. Protesters that violate this set back do so at their own peril.

Note these laws do not infringe on anyone’s freedoms as there are no legal penalties for violating them. They only define the obvious consequences for exercising your freedom of choice in an unwise manner, such as bringing a picket sign to a gun fight.

[Fearless Flyers]

Sort of double posting here, but I kind of improved the language. I think this should be introduced as a bill to the State legislature as an emergency action. The New Jersey hunters should get a lawyer to refine the language and find a legislator to introduce it this afternoon. Publish it in all the State newspapers and prepare for the battle.


If the Governor had any balls he would have introduced a few new laws instead of infringing on the children’s freedoms.

1)
Any minors targeted with harassment or intimidation during legal hunting seasons, by protesters opposed to hunting will understand they are in a life threatening situation and should be expected to use deadly force to protect their self’s.

2)
A 50 yard set back will be instituted between the protesters and any land that is deemed a legal kill zone. Hunting protesters that violate this set back do so at their own peril.

Note these laws do not infringe on anyone’s freedoms as there are no legal penalties for violating them. They only define the obvious consequences for exercising your freedom of choice in an unwise and irresponsible manner, such as bringing a picket sign to a gun fight.

The introduction of these laws is necessary because certain animal rights activists have made it know through threats, both verbally and in writing that they intend to target children who exercise their own freedoms of choice. When mature adults make threats towards children in a civilized liberal society, the children must be given a means to protect themselves.

In the interest of individual freedoms the statutes above insure these freedoms without increasing the need for government to infringe on other’s freedom of choice.