Skip to comments.
US under pressure to back claims over Iraq firefight
Independent ^
| 12/04/03
| Phil Reeves
Posted on 12/03/2003 4:56:10 PM PST by Pokey78
Pressure is mounting on the United States military to support its claim to have killed 54 Iraqi guerrillas in the biggest battle since George Bush declared an end to major combat seven months ago.
Scepticism about the US's version of the death toll has been expressed within upper echelons of the occupation authorities. A US combat leader who was involved in the battle has also denounced the military's account of the battle.
The controversy began on Sunday last week when Iraqi guerrillas attacked two US military convoys escorting new Iraqi currency to banks in Samarra, a Sunni town which is a hotbed of anti-US sentiment.
The US military said later on the same day that it had killed 46 attackers in a battle between insurgents and American soldiers. The army later amended the number of dead upwards to 54. It said its evidence came from US soldiers and commanders involved in the clashes.
Iraqi hospital officials and police say the death toll was far lower - eight with some 55 injured. Iraqi residents have given conflicting and inconsistent accounts of the battle including an erroneous claim that a mosque was hit by an American missile.
The US military believes the bodies of the 54 dead were swiftly collected and buried. But is questionable whether the guerrillas' families or surviving combatants would have risked recovering known members of the resistance in a town which is under constant US surveillance; the Americans have a base in Samarra.
The question is whether the US and the occupation authorities have misled the media.
The credibility of the US military was dented in April after it supplied inaccurate information about the killing of 14 Iraqis in Fallujah by the 82nd Airborne Division, when its soldiers opened fire on demonstrators . In the aftermath of the killings US Central Command said that it was unable to say whether any Iraqis had been killed. However, in Samarra the US army says its soldiers performed fixed procedures for counting those killed and wounded.
These include a battle damage assessment - in which reports are made by US soldiers as the fighting occurs and immediately afterwards - and an after-action report in which soldiers go through what happened in greater detail.
Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt said: "We have no reason to believe that those were inaccurate figures. We stand by those numbers, they were provided by soldiers that were involved in the engagement and we see no reason to suggest those numbers are incorrect."
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; samarraattack
1
posted on
12/03/2003 4:56:10 PM PST
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
Skeptics should attend the next firefight and be allowed to count the bodies.
2
posted on
12/03/2003 4:59:56 PM PST
by
Mike Darancette
(Proud member - Neoconservative Power Vortex)
To: Mike Darancette
I agree 100%.
3
posted on
12/03/2003 5:01:33 PM PST
by
ItisaReligionofPeace
(I'm from the government and I'm here to help.)
To: Pokey78
Okay, two twisted ankles and a paper cut.
We still smoked 'em.
4
posted on
12/03/2003 5:02:58 PM PST
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: Pokey78
The islamofacists are winning this particular pr battle.
Who was the lame-brain who decided to allow the press to pressure him into giving a number (without having hard evidence to prove it) which is what we'll all know they'll require??
To: Principled
"Who was the lame-brain who decided to allow the press to pressure him into giving a number"
I think it was the same guy who found the WMDs.
To: Mike Darancette
I love it how they 'question' enemy casualties and want proof, otherwise we have to assume that the number is much lower, however when civilian casualties are involved no proof is necessary of the number and when the story goes to press the higher the number the better regardless of its validity.
7
posted on
12/03/2003 5:05:05 PM PST
by
American Infidel
(Death penalty not a deterrent? What is the recidivism rate among criminals who receive it?)
To: Pokey78
It's a bad idea to promote body counts as a measure of our Army's success in Iraq, or anywhere else, because it leads to this kind of carping, and is too reminiscent of the McNamara strategy in Vietnam, a PR loser. It implies that we're fighting a defensive war of attrition, one we can never win because, frankly, the enemy doesn't care how many we kill on their side - the more martyrs the better.
8
posted on
12/03/2003 5:06:35 PM PST
by
Argus
((Ninety-nine and forty-four one-hundredths percent Pure Reactionary))
To: Pokey78
We're not under any pressure. We could care less whether they believe us or not. They're irrelevant.
To: John Beresford Tipton
What you wrote doesn't make any sense. Want to try again?
10
posted on
12/03/2003 5:15:10 PM PST
by
Gumption
To: Pokey78
The bottom line folks:
CENTCOM is not judging success or failure with body counts.
CENTCOM is judging success or failure on the effect their efforts have on resistance, bad guys demobilized, that sort of thing.
Bean counting is for Reuters and Associated Press. Our fine military is single-mindedly following their mission which is to rid Iraq of the evildoers.
11
posted on
12/03/2003 5:18:18 PM PST
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: McGavin999
"We're not under any pressure. We could care less whether they believe us or not. They're irrelevant."
If we're not under pressure and they're irrelevant, why are there entire threads on this topic and why do you feel the need to comment. Obviously therefore it is an issue.
To: Mike Darancette
"Pressure is mounting" the Trotskyite Independent claims. The Independent never reveals a source, even in that rare occasion when it does have one.
13
posted on
12/03/2003 5:54:20 PM PST
by
gaspar
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: Pokey78
The article makes the statement,
"A US combat leader who was involved in the battle has also denounced the military's account of the battle., but nowhere in the stroy is this weird staement elaborated or substantiated.
In fact the only staement attributed to anyone that could be termed a "combat leader" SUPPORTS the version of the fight and the casualties that came from the battle assessments.
I think this is sloppy journalism at best and outright lying at worst.
15
posted on
12/03/2003 6:52:47 PM PST
by
John Valentine
("The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein)
To: John Valentine
"I think this is sloppy journalism at best and outright lying at worst."
Or perhaps a truncated article. But I'm leaning towards the "lying" explanation. Since the beginning of the war, I've been amazed at the bias and downright mendacity of the allegedly "objective" British press, so beloved of American liberals.
16
posted on
12/03/2003 7:42:14 PM PST
by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: Dave Elias
Nope, I was merely commenting on the fact that they think it should matter to us whether or not they believe us. I don't care. Besides, it's ALWAYS fun to watch the media make fools of themselves.
To: Pokey78
I think this is one of those self-validating stories you often get on slow news days - the "pressure" seems to come largely from the folks who are saying there's "pressure." I honestly don't think it's much of an issue to anyone who hasn't a vested interest in making it so.
To: American Infidel
I love it how they 'question' enemy casualties and want proof, otherwise we have to assume that the number is much lower, however when civilian casualties are involved no proof is necessary of the number and when the story goes to press the higher the number the better regardless of its validity. Worth saying again.
But really, all of this matters how, again?
19
posted on
12/03/2003 8:16:43 PM PST
by
Ramius
To: Pokey78
Officials Stand by Number of Attackers Killed in Samarra; Operations Continue
By Sgt. 1st Class Doug Sample, USA
American Force Press Service
WASHINGTON, Dec. 3, 2003 - U.S. Central Command officials are standing by the claim that 54 attackers were killed in the Nov. 30 ambush at a bank in Samarra, despite Iraqi civilians who say the number is much lower.
During a briefing from Baghdad today Army Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt, deputy director of operations, Combined Joint Task Force 7, told reporters today that he has "no reason to claim inaccurate figures." Kimmitt had reported the 54 killed in a Dec. 1 briefing.
"In fact we stand by those numbers," Kimmitt said. "Those numbers were provided by soldiers who were involved in the engagement, and we see no other evidence to suggest that those numbers are incorrect," he said, adding, "I trust the reports of my soldiers."
"There is no reason to doubt what the soldiers saw, there is no reason to doubt what the soldiers reported," he emphasized.
Dan Senor, senior spokesperson for the Coalition Provisional Authority, added that coalition forces go through "great efforts" to provide unscrupulous reports after each mission operation. "They (soldiers) have been forthright and truthful, and will continue to be so."
Kimmitt told reporters insurgents who wanted to "steal" the money provoked the Samarra incident. He said an Iraqi currency exchange truck arrived at the town to deliver new dinar to two banks. He said the 4th Infantry Division soldiers' only purpose was to provide security. Currency exchange trucks had been attacked four times in the past, he noted.
"The Iraqi currency exchange trucks were able to perform their mission, which was to bring new dinars into the town and take old dinars out," he explained. "The people who attacked those trucks were attacking not only coalition soldiers, but were attacking Iraqis that were trying to provide money for a restored, restabilized, rebuilt Iraq."
Kimmitt said that once the exchange was done, the soldiers left the town. "They had accomplished their mission, they did not provoke an attack, they responded to an attack from terrorists and from anti-coalition elements and anti-Iraqi forces that wanted to steal the money."
Also during the briefing, Senor, said CPA is focused like a "laser beam" on implementation of the Nov. 15 agreement that sets a deadline vote on a new Iraqi constitution. He said CPA chief Ambassador L. Paul Bremer continues to meet with members of the Iraqi Governing Council to work on the deadline.
Senor said a sign of progress in meeting that goal is the council's establishment of two committees to look at direct elections to the constitutional convention. "Both of those," he pointed out, "were welcomed as a very positive sign by the ambassador that we are working closely with the governing council and they're taking their own steps to get the process moving."
He said Bremer paid a third visit Dec. 2 to the 37-member Baghdad Council, the political body that represents the nine districts within Baghdad.
Senor said during that visit, the ambassador discussed with council members issues pertaining to corruption in Iraq, the role of women in the political process, the security situation, the U.S. supplemental funding in the country for the coming years, and efforts to reduce Iraq foreign sovereign debt.
Kimmitt also told reporters that operations in the country remain "relatively stable." He said that military offensive and "intelligence-based" operations continue to enable a free Iraq. Those operations, he said, are designed to "kill or capture" anti-coalition and anti-Iraqi elements attempting to obstruct a safe and secure environment in Iraq. He told reporters that continued raids and cordons and searches have led to hundreds of enemy captures and weapons seizures.
In separate releases, CENTCOM reported that 82nd Airborne Division paratroopers captured Brig. Gen. Daham Al Mahemdi during an early morning cordon and search mission today. He is suspected of having indirect contact with Saddam Hussein and directing anti-coalition activities in Fallujah.
Soldiers found two AK-47 assault rifles, five AK-47 magazines, a 9 mm pistol, a 9 mm pistol magazine, a shotgun, one 100-round drum of ammunition, and assorted documents, including a photograph of Mahemdi in an Iraqi Army uniform, at his home.
Elements the division's 3rd Brigade also captured a suspected financier of anti-coalition activities, Abu Bilal Al Janabi. He is suspected of financing and aiding anti- coalition activities, including paying rewards for attacks against coalition forces.
Also soldiers from the 1st Brigade, 1st Infantry Division, discovered a large weapons and ammunition cache north of Khalidiyah. The cache contained 650 plastic anti-tank mines, 400 anti-personnel mines, and 280 rocket-propelled grenade warheads, RPG fuel rods and propellant, as well as 10 anti-tank missiles, and various small arms and demolitions.
In another joint operation with Iraqi security forces, CENTCOM reported the 173rd Airborne Brigade, part of 4th Infantry Division's Task Force Ironhorse, captured 26 suspected Fedayeen Saddam members. During that operation, soldiers confiscated 62 AK-47s, 200 rounds of AK-47 ammunition, one rocket- propelled grenade launcher and two improvised-explosive-device-making kits.
Kimmitt also reported that in the past 24 hours coalition forces overall conducted 1,658 patrols and 22 raids, and captured 115 anti-coalition suspects. In the southeast, multinational division forces conducted another 240 patrols and two raids, and detained 25 personnel. Another 41 individuals were captured in the northeast zone, he said.
Four individuals with Iranian paperwork were detained after coalition forces found numerous arms and weapons in a mini- bus stopped in Basra, he said. "Among the weapons seized were several rocket-propelled grenade launchers and rifles," he noted.
In Baghdad, the 1st Armored Division detained 14 individuals suspected of ties to former regime leader Saddam Hussein's paramilitary Fedayeen Saddam. Three Iraqis were captured in a separate raid on targets suspected of attacks against the coalition. According to Kimmitt, they had $1.4 million dinar, three computers, Wahabi Islam sect booklets, Osama bin Laden literature, and weapons and ammunition in their possession.
Kimmitt reported that over the past seven days, U.S. forces have seen a trend that is "below recent norms" in the number of enemy attacks. He noted that coalition forces have encountered an average 19 engagements per day by the enemy, three less than 22 attacks per day reported a week ago. During the period, there were two attacks on Iraqi military and two attacks on Iraqi civilians, he said.
Kimmitt told reporters that the 101st Airborne Division has completed training another battalion of soldiers for the Iraqi Civil Defense Corps, bringing that unit's total to four battalions. Kimmitt said the battalion's soldiers will be responsible for securing Iraq oil pipelines and other infrastructure, and will be "fully integrated into combat operations and infrastructure security."
In addition, he said the coalition is helping Iraq to form an elite special force within the Iraqi Police. "What we're developing is a capability for the Iraqis to provide their own security," he said. "Most police forces throughout the world have special police forces inside their organizations.
It is just an ordinary part of police activities."
In other developments in the country, Kimmitt said the Iraqi Student Union has declared itself against terrorist attacks in Iraq and is planning to start a campaign supporting social and political stabilization of the country.
Senor also reported that at the Republican Guard Palace Dec. 2, the first of the four heads in a monument of Saddam Hussein was torn down. The others will be taken down in coming days, which he called a very "important and symbolic" gesture.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror; Click to Add Topic
KEYWORDS: IRAQ; KILLED; SAMARRA; SAMARRAATTACK; Click to Add Keyword
[ Report Abuse | Bookmark ]
1 posted on 12/03/2003 2:46 PM CST by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
20
posted on
12/03/2003 8:23:46 PM PST
by
2111USMC
(the few, the proud, The Marines!)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson