I did not.
You cannot understand English.
Let's parse this.
Bestiality should not be so [a subject in which you have a keen interest] if you (and everything else on this planet) 'evolved' for it would be ingrained in our jeans to do so. Your words.
You are saying you would not have a keen interest in bestiality if you and everyone else on this planet had evolved. Therefore, you are saying your keen interest results from not having evolved (this I can see). Since the debate is between evolution and creation and you claim not to have evolved (hence your keen interest in bestiality), you must have been created. Therefore, from your own words, your interest in bestiality is the result of your creation. Since you believe God created you, then you are saying it's God's fault you have a keen interest in bestiality. I told you not to go there.
I have not twisted your words. If you meant to convey something else, you did a right poor job of it. Of course, being that I have an extensive journalistic background and a couple of college courses in logic behind me, I regularly get the opportunity (and take it) to parse others' words to see just exactly what they saying. This is most fun with political speech, but can be enjoyable on the occasional Free Republic thread, too.