Skip to comments.
Mars Pictures Beamed Back To Earth
Ananova ^
| 12-3-2003
Posted on 12/03/2003 3:21:28 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
1
posted on
12/03/2003 3:21:28 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
Kind of a crappy picture. Looks like a smudge.
2
posted on
12/03/2003 3:23:00 PM PST
by
dead
(I used to believe in a lot of things. All of it! Now I believe only in dynamite.)
To: dead
"Kind of a crappy picture. Looks like a smudge." I think the French are involved.
3
posted on
12/03/2003 3:27:21 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
If the French were involved it would be white, square, and waving
4
posted on
12/03/2003 3:28:36 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(The U.N. is a terrorist organization)
To: blam
5
posted on
12/03/2003 3:29:00 PM PST
by
Kay Soze
(Liberal Homosexuals kill more people than Global Warming, SUVs’, Firearms & Terrorism combined.)
To: dead
I see George Bush's face in that dark smudge in the center. No, really!
To: blam
![](http://www.wiseacre-gardens.com/wallpaper/marvint.jpg)
We will be waiting for you.
To: Kay Soze
HAHA!!
To: dead
Kind of a crappy picture. Looks like the quality of picture you'd get of Mars when taking the photo from the Earth. Either they have a really lousy camera on board that spacecraft, or someone's trying to pass off a terran-based photo as a space-based photo.
9
posted on
12/03/2003 3:31:14 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(Conservative: One who doesn't believe that turning the U.S. into a third-world nation is 'progress'.)
To: blam
may have been covered with water. It is therefore a good place to look for evidence that life once existed on Mars, Myth Number 1: Where there's water, there's life.
To: blam
With all of the robotic space probes about the arrive at their destinations, the next few months will be exciting.
We will see more real science exploration in the next two months, from these low cost robotic probes, than 10 years worth of manned missions with the Shuttle.
Robots first, man second!
11
posted on
12/03/2003 3:33:19 PM PST
by
Hunble
To: Prime Choice
Looks like the quality of picture you'd get of Mars when taking the photo from the Earth. Either they have a really lousy camera on board that spacecraft, or someone's trying to pass off a terran-based photo as a space-based photo.My thoughts exactly. My company builds high resolution cameras for spacecraft. We'd lose all our contracts with crappy images like that.
Coupled with their admission that they are operating on 30% of their electrical power, perhaps the Euroweenies spacecraft will join the Japanese one that failed earlier this week.
To: firebrand
Why we never find life on Mars....
![](http://www.ahajokes.com/cartoon/pathfind.jpg)
13
posted on
12/03/2003 3:45:09 PM PST
by
Hunble
To: Kay Soze
14
posted on
12/03/2003 3:46:09 PM PST
by
South40
(My vote helped defeat cruz bustamante; did yours?)
To: blam
One can only hope that the pics will be sharp enough to identify the squadrillions of taxpayer dollars strewn about the Martian landscape. So far, our investment has demonstrated that some of the rocks on Mars are brownish-red, whereas others are reddish-brown. They also differ from one another in size and shape.
To: Hunble
16
posted on
12/03/2003 3:50:27 PM PST
by
blam
To: firebrand
Myth Number 1: Where there's water, there's life. Fact number 1: Where there's no water, there's no life.
So where do you look for life?
17
posted on
12/03/2003 3:56:40 PM PST
by
Salman
(Mickey Akbar)
To: All
More exciting will be the close-ups from Saturn due in next year July 1, 2004. At least I'm excited about it. We will finally get good closeups of the rings, and will be launching a miny probe to check out Titan. The Cassini spacecraft was launched on October 15, 1997. Mars is old news, this is something we haven't seen up close before.
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/solarsystem/saturn_cassini.html
18
posted on
12/03/2003 4:19:46 PM PST
by
jempet
To: Salman
Myth Number 1: Where there's water, there's life. Fact number 1: Where there's no water, there's no life.
If we follow the guidelines set out by environmentalists, you can have water and no life -- MTBE comes to mind.
To: firebrand
Where have you seen water that had no life within?
20
posted on
12/03/2003 4:52:42 PM PST
by
Gumption
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson