Skip to comments.
Group seeks Prop. 187-like ballot measure
San Diego Union Tribune ^
| December 3, 2003
| Ed Mendel
Posted on 12/03/2003 9:08:00 AM PST by gubamyster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: Reaganwuzthebest
Arizona has an initiative going as wellGo Arizona!
21
posted on
12/03/2003 8:13:44 PM PST
by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: GrandMoM
Time and familiar association has created less animosity and more toleranceNot in my area. Most I know are more pissed off than ever. That was maybe their intention, or agenda, but it didn't happen. Those that want to roll over can head to Hacksaw Arkansas.
This was the will of the people. No one fell asleep. We will abide.
22
posted on
12/03/2003 8:17:29 PM PST
by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: gubamyster
The more taxes I pay and the more illegals that break and enter into my country, the less tolerant I become about my taxes going to pay for benefits for illegals.That says it all!
23
posted on
12/03/2003 8:18:48 PM PST
by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: DumpsterDiver
Thanks, DD! I'll download lots of petitions. Everyone I know wants this to happen, they're all sick of paying for the open borders fiasco.
To: gubamyster; Pro-Bush
"This business of trying to pander to one ethnic group or another that doesn't wash very well with the public," Prince said
Bump!
25
posted on
12/04/2003 5:05:24 AM PST
by
JustPiper
(Teach the Children to fight Liberalism ! They will be voting in 2008 !!!)
To: JustPiper
This is good. Time to strike while the iron is hot.
Change has to happen at the state level since the federal government is at a stalemate over illegal immigration.
26
posted on
12/04/2003 5:13:05 AM PST
by
Missouri
To: gubamyster
Proposition 187 was passed by voters in 1994 after a divisive campaign, but was struck down in court because of a conflict with federal law. Do any of the Freeper legal types know exactly what the "conflict" was?
Has anything changed since then to expect a different outcome?
Other than the 9th Circus Court, is there anything preventing its implementation?
27
posted on
12/04/2003 5:16:13 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: Publius6961
I had the impression that the ruling claimed California was overstepping its authority on federal matters (immigration). Or, maybe she said CA didn't have authority to determine who was/wasn't legally here.
28
posted on
12/04/2003 5:33:01 AM PST
by
heleny
To: Publius6961
BTTT
29
posted on
12/04/2003 6:15:12 AM PST
by
GrandMoM
("Without prayer, the hand of GOD stops, BUT, with prayer the hand of GOD moves !!!)
To: Publius6961
Do any of the Freeper legal types know exactly what the "conflict" was? Ron Prince was on John & Ken (KFI 640) yesterday. He stated that the original Prop 187 banned illegals from education & health care. This new prop would not have those restrictions & basically compelled the state of CA to conform to Federal laws.
He indicated they knew of the problems with the original Prop 187 & designed it to challenge earlier Supreme Court rulings on banning illegals from education. Since this new prop does not have the education & health care restrictions, he does not see how it can loose if challenged in court.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson