A theory of everything has to include...........everything.
8 posted on
12/02/2003 10:13:24 PM PST by
Consort
To: Consort
A theory of everything has to include...........everything.Well, my theory of everything includes everything except flightless waterfowl.
This doesn't make any sense.
Wait a minute. I see the problem--I forgot to carry the two.
34 posted on
12/03/2003 4:23:26 AM PST by
Poohbah
("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
To: Consort
A theory of everything has to include...........everything.Everything fundamental, that is. A "theory of everything" doesn't have to include chemistry, for example, because all of that is an application of quantum electrodynamics. And all of biology is an application of chemistry.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson