Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI Wary of Anthrax Probe Disclosure
AP ^ | December 2, 2003

Posted on 12/02/2003 1:52:49 PM PST by Shermy

WASHINGTON - Disclosure of what the FBI knows about the deadly 2001 anthrax attacks could enable terrorists to engineer biological weapons to escape detection, the FBI says in documents filed in response to a lawsuit by a scientist labeled a "person of interest" in the case.

Citing the criminal investigation and national security concerns, the Justice Department is trying to persuade a federal judge to delay the lawsuit filed by Dr. Stephen J. Hatfill, who contends the government invaded his privacy and ruined his reputation by leaking information to the media implicating him in the attacks.

Hatfill has denied any role in the attacks and his lawsuit seeks to clear his name and recover unspecified monetary damages.

Richard L. Lambert, the FBI inspector in charge of what is being called the "Amerithrax" investigation, says in a court document that Hatfill's lawsuit could jeopardize the probe and expose national secrets related to U.S. bioweapons defense measures.

"In the hands of those hostile to the U.S., this valuable intelligence could aid state sponsors of terrorism or terrorist organizations in their efforts to genetically engineer or alter their anthrax bioweapons to 'spoof' or escape detection," Lambert said.

Disclosure also would make public the vulnerabilities and capabilities of U.S. government installations to bioweapons attacks and expose sensitive intelligence collection sources and methods, Lambert said.

There is no proven link between terrorist groups and the October 2001 anthrax attacks that killed five people and sickened 17 others. The government has, however, repeatedly warned of al-Qaida's interest in using anthrax or other chemical and biological weapons to mount attacks.

In the FBI document, filed Nov. 21 in U.S. District Court in Washington, Lambert calls the anthrax probe "unprecedented in the FBI's 95-year history" because of its scope and complexity. In all, the investigation has consumed some 231,000 agent hours, he said.

Lambert described the investigation as "active and ongoing" and said agents' work is divided between checking into individuals who could be linked to the attacks and an intensive scientific effort to determine how the spores themselves were made using "cutting-edge forensic techniques and analysis."

The court papers stop short of confirming that Hatfill is among those being investigated.

Hatfill was labeled a "person of interest" in the probe in August 2002 by Attorney General John Ashcroft and says in his lawsuit that FBI agents have had him under surveillance around the clock.

That surveillance — which once led agents in a vehicle to run over Hatfill's foot on a Washington street — has dropped off in recent weeks, according to one person close to Hatfill and two federal law enforcement officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. The officials, however, cautioned against drawing the conclusion that Hatfill no longer was of interest to investigators.

Lambert said in the court document that Hatfill's lawsuit could force the FBI to divulge its "interest in specific individuals," who could then destroy or hide evidence, flee the country, intimidate witnesses or make up alibis. None of these individuals are identified.

The Justice Department is seeking to delay Hatfill's case until a decision is made on a forthcoming government attempt to dismiss the lawsuit entirely. Hatfill's lawyers were preparing a response Tuesday opposing the delay.

Hatfill's lawsuit is seeking unspecified monetary damages from Ashcroft, the FBI and Justice Department and other current and former officials. His lawyers contend that the government linked him to the attacks to make it seem that the investigation was making progress.

Hatfill once worked as a researcher at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick in Frederick, Md. Hatfill says he never worked with infectious diseases such as anthrax, however.


TOPICS: Anthrax Scare; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; amerithrax; anthrax; ashcroft; fbi; framehatfill; hatfill; lambert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 12/02/2003 1:52:49 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: okie01; Mitchell; pokerbuddy0; Allan; aristeides; Betty Jo; TrebleRebel; muawiyah; mrustow; ...
Ping.
2 posted on 12/02/2003 1:54:46 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
CYA is first order of business for the FBI.
3 posted on 12/02/2003 1:56:32 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
CYA is first order of business for the FBI.

Hatfill is suing for millions. For that reason some might not want to 'fess up that he's innocent.

4 posted on 12/02/2003 1:58:25 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
"Richard Jewell, paging Richard Jewell....."
5 posted on 12/02/2003 1:59:04 PM PST by cardinal4 (Hillary and Clark rhymes with Ft Marcy park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Recent article:

ANTHRAX POWDER - STATE OF THE ART?

Dense text, which says it unlikely a "lone" fellow could have made it.

6 posted on 12/02/2003 2:01:33 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Well, hell. That does it for me. If Stephen Hatfill asserts something in court papers, then it must be true. <\sarcasm>
7 posted on 12/02/2003 2:02:42 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Yes. Well anyone who has followed this story should know that, despite early assertions by the goverment that the antrhrax could have been made by a college student in his basement, the Anthrax was in fact weaponized using very expensive and sophisticated techniques, and was almost certainly created with state sponsorship.
8 posted on 12/02/2003 2:06:10 PM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
IMO, the real villain in the Jewell case was not the FBI but the media. Jewell thought so, too: he sued them and not the government, right?
9 posted on 12/02/2003 2:07:19 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I had misfortune to work with, not for, the FBI several times over many years. After a time it became necassary to become non-cooperative. A few were ok, by and large it was better off to give them nothing.
10 posted on 12/02/2003 2:11:26 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
IMO, the real villain in the Jewell case was not the FBI but the media. Jewell thought so, too: he sued them and not the government, right?

The Clinton admin had a very good reason for keeping Jewell on the front page; he was a white southern secuirty guard. On the heels of BJB blaming "The Right Wing" for OKC, Jewell just looked the part.

11 posted on 12/02/2003 2:12:59 PM PST by cardinal4 (Hillary and Clark rhymes with Ft Marcy park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Sure. They've gotta' keep it "secret" and make sure no one knows what they're doing.

But every time a Hatfill activity is underway, they're out giving the press a heads-up and detailed background info.

If I recall, the search of the lake a few months ago was reported the day before it actually happened. When they're searching his apartment, its reported here in real time here on FR (e.g., "The FBI is searching Hatfill's apartment in Frederic, MD right now!").

12 posted on 12/02/2003 2:13:00 PM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smogger; TrebleRebel
Certainly for the first 9 months or so some in the govt, and more speculators outside the govt, tried to foist the lone-nut-made-it story.

But the characterization of the actual science by the weapons didn't match the "basment" theory UNTIL AFTER the public rigamarole about Hatfill began. Matsumoto's article mentions this. He also mentions that the weapon to be "reverse-engineered" at Dugway was NOT the actual weaponized anthrax used to attack us (with silica and polymerized glass), but a design without those materials that could possibly be made by a person with the abilities of Hatfill. IOW, if we accept Matsumoto, the Dugway adventure (as far as we know) was useless. Question - why try to recreate a weapon that wasn't actually at issue?
13 posted on 12/02/2003 2:14:04 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: angkor
At least the all important PR departments at the FBI are successful. They should receive an award.
14 posted on 12/02/2003 2:21:01 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: angkor
In the hands of those hostile to the U.S., this valuable intelligence could aid state sponsors of terrorism or terrorist organizations in their efforts to genetically engineer or alter their anthrax bioweapons to 'spoof' or escape detection," Lambert said.

Interesting, I've never read anything before about genetic engineering and escaping detection being a concern.

15 posted on 12/02/2003 2:23:09 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Thanks for the ping!
16 posted on 12/02/2003 2:25:52 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
"Disclosure of what the FBI knows about the deadly 2001 anthrax attacks....."

Gives new meaning to the words "legal brief".....

17 posted on 12/02/2003 2:42:39 PM PST by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tracer
In relation to the Bureau's performance on this case, "Legal Briefs" suggests brown-stained shorts...
18 posted on 12/02/2003 2:47:25 PM PST by genefromjersey (So little time - so many FLAMES to light !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tracer
"Disclosure of what the FBI knows about the deadly 2001 anthrax attacks....."

Bupkis.

19 posted on 12/02/2003 2:48:39 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I imagine Hatfill would be willing to settle the case in return for a cash payment and an agreement by the government to stop the harassment. I see no reason why the government has to reveal any secrets. They can settle the case.
20 posted on 12/02/2003 2:51:42 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson