Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pollywog
"I hope the LifeNews story was correct. It sounds like if it is, Judge Greer will have to make a decision in the case, whether to appoint a new guardian or not."

"How soon would this have to be done??"

I'm really don't have any idea. I'm just trying to be positive about the outcome. It just seems reasonable to me.

Can anyone find out from Terri's organization if Judge Greer could go ahead and appoint a new guardian if he gets a recommendation to remove Michael?
70 posted on 12/02/2003 2:08:29 PM PST by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: FR_addict
It just seems reasonable to me.

That is why this case is so horrible. It is so unreasonable from start to finish. There must be great corruption among virtually the entire FL judiciary! George F. Felos says that "EVERY judge" in FL who has heard any part of this case favors letting Terri be dehydrated and starved. God, please help Terri and the State of FL as well!!!
129 posted on 12/02/2003 9:20:32 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: FR_addict
Wolfson was appointed pursuant to Terri's Law, and as long as that is in place, the Law states that Terri will have a Guardian Ad Litem. If MS is removed through the Schindler's petition, I am guessing that the Guardian Ad Litem will continue to represent her interests. In other words, there would be no reason for Greer to appoint an guardian if one is already serving through Terri's Law. The Schindler's can petition to replace MS with Bobby Schindler if MS is removed, but in that case I think Wolfson or another third party would continue to serve pursuant to Terri's Law. The appointment of the GAL addresses the need for a third party when there is disagreement among family members...there is no reason that Bobby Schindler could not be Terri's legal guardian, while Wolfson is the GAL, as MS is currently the legal guardian while Wolfson is serving as GAL.

Why doesn't MS just give up and let her family take care of her? I can understand the Schindler's determination to litigate Terri's right to live, yet I cannot fathom what it takes to pour an equal amount of energy, time and money in seeing her killed, as HINO has done. If she has no consciousness, as MS says, then why should he be concerned if her parents think she does?? If she is truly not "there" why is he focused on carrying out her alleged wishes? According to him, she is unaware of her existence, so how could she be suffering? He wants the Schindlers to suffer, out of spite, plain and simple.
132 posted on 12/02/2003 9:43:05 PM PST by msmagoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson