Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Apparently the NY Slimes is not prospering from the GW Bush economic recovery.

The good news for our side just continues flow out and down all over the rats.

1 posted on 12/01/2003 1:36:57 PM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Grampa Dave
bummer!
2 posted on 12/01/2003 1:38:29 PM PST by Wheee The People (If this post is worthless, it also doubles as a bump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
http://www.polipundit.com/2003_11_30_polipundit_archive.html#107024644267461983

Sunday, November 30, 2003
Answer to the Media

Reader tomj writes in a comment below:
i figure i have one way certain to respond to the bias of the aforementioned liberal liars. i have cancelled my subscripions and get my news articles free via polipundit and realclearpolitics....
Many more people than you may realize are reacting similarly.

In fact the New York Times lost 5.3 percent of its readership in the last six-month survey, the largest loss among the top newspapers. The LA Times, Chicago Tribune and Washington Post all lost readers. Meanwhile the New York Post's readership jumped 10 percent. The Wall Street Journal and USA Today also gained readers. After the LA Times' carefully-scheduled last-minute hit piece on Arnold Schwarzenegger, it lost at least 10,000 subscribers according to its managing editor.

Fox News is soaring and has more viewers than all the other cable news networks combined. And Fox News' ratings are already comparable to the broadcast network newscasts, which are in ratings freefall. And keep in mind that Fox News is on 24 hours; so it has many more viewers who tune in for a specific program every day. In fact, 22 percent of Americans already cite Fox News as their primary news source and it wouldn't surprise me if Fox News ratings were to surpass network newscasts in a few years.

Conservatives today dominate the Internet, with sites like TownHall.com and right-leaning blogs like InstaPundit.com getting far more clicks than their liberal competitors.

Slowly but surely we're tearing down the left's Orwellian propaganda machine.
posted by PoliPundit at 6:40 PM Link to this post | Comments (3)
3 posted on 12/01/2003 1:38:43 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
Oh Tsk Tsk Maybe they should ask A.N.S.W.E.R to come to their rescue. They seem to like posting their ads in their paper.
5 posted on 12/01/2003 1:40:50 PM PST by areafiftyone (Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
The way to beat the liberals is, in part, to cut off their propaganda machine... the liberal media.

We must ALL withdraw from the liberal media if we, as conservatives, are to defeat it and them.

7 posted on 12/01/2003 1:43:15 PM PST by BFM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
The Wall Street Journal, is averaging 8.3 pages per day so far this November, which is up from the November 2002 level of 6.8 pages per day.

What's the price for a full page ad, and how much does it cost the WSJ to print it? If the price per ad went down 15% their profits would be about the same.
8 posted on 12/01/2003 1:43:19 PM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
More good news re the Slimes. You probably knew about this before it was published.
9 posted on 12/01/2003 1:43:33 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Sore@US, the Evil Daddy War bucks, has owned the Demonic Rats for decades!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
The former "paper of record" continues its pathetic decline.
Good.
11 posted on 12/01/2003 1:45:43 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro
"Lackluster Ad Trend" ping...
16 posted on 12/01/2003 1:55:14 PM PST by Constitution Day (...he typed, rubbing his chin knowingly...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave

21 posted on 12/01/2003 2:32:01 PM PST by martin_fierro (_____oooo_(_°_¿_°_)_oooo_____)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...

Schadenfreude

This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.


26 posted on 12/01/2003 3:08:19 PM PST by Timesink (I'm not a big fan of electronic stuff, you know? Beeps ... beeps freak me out. They're bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Temple Owl
PING

You'll love this one.
27 posted on 12/01/2003 3:18:30 PM PST by Tribune7 (It's not like he let his secretary drown in his car or something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
I'll be quite happy with the New York Times stocks are on the same level as Salon.com. Then I'll celebrate.
30 posted on 12/01/2003 4:04:34 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
Don't worry. Next year is election year.

When Bush raises $100MM, and Dean raises $75MM, and the DNC raises $50MM, and 34 Senators run for reelection, where do you think all that money is going to go?

It's going to go to ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, NYT, LAT, WashPost, etc., in ads, ads, ads.

It's like a money spigot that turns on every two years for the media, like clockwork.

-PJ

32 posted on 12/01/2003 4:23:38 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave; *CCRM
Posted to *CCRM
39 posted on 12/01/2003 7:25:35 PM PST by Copernicus (A Constitutional Republic revolves around Sovereign Citizens, not citizens around government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson