Replies

Physicians say increased high-risk unprotected homosexual sex is increasing dramatically, not dropping.

Many homosexuals seem to associate high risk with sexual satisfaction, much as a drug users initially do.

As this is 100% voluntary choice and action, they are well aware that this often gets spread by bi-sexuals to womem, children, babies, and hetrosexual men.

The fact that homos are demanding and sneaking in blood from homosexuals into the world's blood banks is evidence that many have a insane hidden desire and agenda to infect normal hetrosexuals with their killer monkey disease.

Years back TB infected patients were by statute committed to TB sanitariums until their TB was arrested.

Today because so many AIDS homos contract TB they are allowed to freely roam our public streets and spread TB and worse.

PC run amuck.

150 male homo partners in one year is obviously insane and unreasonable, but who says any unprotected "volunteer" is/was sane or resonable.

The disease is in their minds.

The contagion is our politicians.

No rancher is allowed to let Anthrax or Blackleg infected cattle to mix with healthy cattle.

I should know; I raised Brahma and dairy cattle in south Florida.

The US Department of Agriculture and the US Department of Health mandate not their "cure" in a sanitarium.

You know what their laws and regulations require.

The longer an AIDS infected person remains free to roam and "interact" in society the more innocent uinfected hetrosexual citizens will die.

The longer society prolongs the life of AIDS infected persons, the more they will infect with killer AIDS.

There is bo cure for AIDS.

There is no cure for Anthrax.

Don't wait for a cure; it is not coming. AIDS adapts and mutates.

As homosexuals and liberals do.

But the AIDS homo will live a longer and more "entertaining" life.

That is what counts.

Sensitivity!

(see: Africa, AIDS infection sand death rates)

All sing "I Want to Teach The World To Sing" now!

I have a friend who was widowed when her husband, who had hemophilia, got HIV from unsafe blood products used to treat his genetic disease. His infection happened before screening procedures were in place, so I consider it a bad outcome rather than medical negligence, but that's neither here nor there. It seems to take a lawsuit to get people to fix these things anyway. (Why IS that?)

His death was long and painful--and expensive, even before the life-prolonging drug regimens became available. Little was known then, so all HIV carriers were guinea pigs, by necessity.

Also long and painful was the resulting class-action lawsuit, which left her with a paid-off-house...and angry former in-laws who felt the money should have been theirs, so they've been dragging her back to court periodically to try to get the money away from her. She is HIV negative which is truly a blessing and a miracle, but she may never find a man who is as good to her as the one she lost.

That anyone could deliberately or negligently spread this to innocent others absolutely infuriates me. As you say--it is NOT curable--but we know enough now to be almost 100% sure of preventing it.

Please note in Africa, HIV positive men are raping infants to try to "cure" their infections. There's hardly a way in the world to keep anyone safe when people set out to make innocent people sick.