[Ichneumon]

Though I don't have the link handy, a quick run though this thread will produce several sources of these statements that are not from NewsMax. As I recall, one is a Buffalo, NY newspaper.

I'm not doubting her quoted comments. What I'm finding fault with is the NewsMax "spin" in the headline. Hillary said a number of outrageous things, but contrary to NewsMax's headline, she did *NOT* say (directly or indirectly) that "support for the war is fading". In fact, she made no comment about whether support was fading, growing, or remaining constant.

Look, anything these seething pig excrement Klintoons do can set me off,

Agreed.

but this stuff looks pretty real to me...

Not NewsMax's headline, which hysterically "cries wolf" about what Her Nibs *actually* said. What she actually said was outrageous enough -- what good does it do for NewsMax to lie about it and get people stirred up over something she *didn't* actually say? It makes conservatives look like half-cocked fools with poor reading comprehension when they do stuff like this.

It's as bad as all the times that liberals get worked up into a froth over something that conservatives (especially President Bush) never actually said (e.g. "he told us Iraq was an imminent threat" or "he told us Iraq had nuclear weapons" [TeddyK], etc.).

[MEG33]

It was a Americans support the troops but doubt Bush's policies.Now she wants to turn it over to the UN.That indicates support for the war fading.She told them what poor planning.The poor troops are being led by fools she seemed to say.