[Ichneumon]

She also suggested that the U.S. could eventually loose the war in Iraq

As opposed to tighten it?

It has long been apparent that NewsMax doesn't even bother to employ an editor. So just how big is this "staff" that gets credited so often?

Furthermore, the contents of the article do not support the inflammatory headline ("Hillary to Troops: Support for War Fading"). While it is indeed tacky of the Shrew to use the troops to say that "there are many questions at home about the administration's policies", that is *not* the same as saying that support for the war is "fading". Stating the obvious (that some people have questions about policies) says nothing about whether overall support is fading, remaining constant, or growing.

Sadly, after too many instances of "crying wolf" like this, I now have more regard for the journalistic professionalism of the National Enquirer than I do for NewsMax.

[GunnyB]

Though I don't have the link handy, a quick run though this thread will produce several sources of these statements that are not from NewsMax. As I recall, one is a Buffalo, NY newspaper.

Look, anything these seething pig excrement Klintoons do can set me off, but this stuff looks pretty real to me...

[thesummerwind]

Yes, the NewsMax headline could be seen as an over statement. But, the direct meaning of all her comments was clear. They were destructive to the good people in our military, IMO.