Skip to comments.
CONDI ON NOW-TODAY SHOW
TODAY SHOW
| 11/28/03
Posted on 11/28/2003 4:43:36 AM PST by STARWISE
GO NOW
TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: condi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
To: EQAndyBuzz
I said that she was destined for the office in 1988.
To: hchutch
No-o-o-o!!!
Condi in 2008, and show the the Democraps how really racist we are by giving her our unwaving and heartfelt support!
If you think they can't handle things now just try to imagine what that would do to them.
Ba-Wa-wa-w-a-waaa
42
posted on
11/28/2003 7:45:53 AM PST
by
Bad Dog2
(Bad Dog - No Biscuit)
To: Guenevere; Savage Beast
RE Oprah:
She has snookered many, and I hope you realize this!Amen. How hard is it to see how shallow this woman is? She panders to the ultra-liberal Hollyweird set and is positively threatened when confronted with a right-wing African American woman who is far more intelligent than she could ever aspire to be.
43
posted on
11/28/2003 7:50:17 AM PST
by
dansangel
(*PROUD to be a knuckle-dragging, toothless, inbred, right-wing, Southern, gun-toting Neanderthal *)
To: section9; All
To: anniegetyourgun
Just think of Lockhart as irrelevance rearing it's ugly head, and it will make you smile. Same goes for Hillary.
45
posted on
11/28/2003 8:02:53 AM PST
by
kylaka
To: mware
How can a President attend every single funeral of fallen soldier? Doing this would downplay our efforts in the war. Bush has already issued numerous statements of praise and made phone calls.
X42 never made any phone calls to the families of Marines dragged in Somalia or the USS Cole bombing.
46
posted on
11/28/2003 8:06:34 AM PST
by
ServesURight
(FReecerely Yours,)
To: STARWISE
I watched about 3 minutes of her on one of the network broadcasts. Couldn't take it. "So doesn't the high security involved with the President's visit just underscore how little progress we've made in Iraq?" "So essentially we haven't made any progress at all in the last 6 months?"
And the lefties have the nerve to claim the media is biased against THEM???
47
posted on
11/28/2003 8:12:55 AM PST
by
Spyder
(Just another day in Paradise)
To: section9
Chris, everyone here better figure this out: Rice is (so far) NOT a politician. She has not run for office; not gotten a single vote in a single eleciton; not raised a penny. Barring a phenomenal next four years, she will not be material for a presidential candidate. Maybe Veep, but even then, she brings no voter appeal/sectional appeal to the table. I'm sorry, but we all have to realize that there are QUALIFICATIONS to running for office, and as distasteful as they may be, they involve the ability to run an organization; appoint people; and RAISE MONEY.
48
posted on
11/28/2003 10:40:45 AM PST
by
LS
To: GraniteStateConservative
"In all my years of interviewing, I have never been prouder to spell my name woman than after spending time with Condoleezza Rice." --OprahI'm glad you told me this, GSC. Thanks. I could not understand how anyone as bright as Oprah could fail to appreciate, respect, and admire Condoleezza Rice.
I think I misunderstood the situation, and, frankly, I'm glad I did. I admire and respect both of them.
49
posted on
11/28/2003 3:52:49 PM PST
by
Savage Beast
(If Europeans cannot remember the price of appeasement, Americans are well qualified to remind them.)
To: StriperSniper
"she got real lucky that it worked out so big."The highly intelligent are often "lucky". George Bush, for example.
50
posted on
11/28/2003 4:02:07 PM PST
by
Savage Beast
(If Europeans cannot remember the price of appeasement, Americans are well qualified to remind them.)
To: LS
She did both at Stanford. Same thing on a much smaller scale. As head of the NSC and as Stanford provost, she easily met both your first and second qualifications. At Stanford, she not only raised money, she brought Stanford's budget into the black.
She's executive material, and she's as telegenic as the day is long.
And she's from California. Now unless you want to tell me what a bangup candidate Bill Frist or Santorum would make going up against the Hildebeast, I suggest you give Condi a second look.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
51
posted on
11/28/2003 5:35:11 PM PST
by
section9
(Major Kusanagi says, "Click on my pic and read my blog, or eat lead!")
To: section9
Trust me---I am in academics---running a University in no way is the same as being in mainstream politics, where you have to build a support base from among big-time political machines. The first thing Bush did, long after being governor of one of the largest states in the Union, was build a network of all the other governors. Bush spent the better part of two years cultivating this network, and even then, it can be argued, it didn't help him all that much.
Rice has absolutely no experience at that context. All you have to do to see this in action is to look at the MUCH more qualified Ken Blackwell here in OH and see how the Taft machine basically squeezed him out when he easily could have run four years ago.
Further, to throw up Frist or Santorum as "lock-in" alternatives ignores the more likely possibility that any one of several GOP governors might make a run at things, or to ignore Rudy Guliani. Rice's lack of a "vote casting record," in any elected capacity, hurts further (see Wesley Clark in this regard). Despite his inconsistencies, Howard Dean actually has a record of "accomplishments" that he can point to. In short, I think it is fantasy for conservatives to continue to pine for Condi as presidential material. POSSIBLY as VP, and even then, it is shaky.
52
posted on
11/29/2003 6:11:10 AM PST
by
LS
To: Savage Beast
Believe me, they are friends, She may have appeared that way to you because she did not want to appear closer to Condi Rice than she really is. Remember the photo of her and Condi and Gail at the White House and the boob joke?
53
posted on
12/03/2003 10:18:42 AM PST
by
rave123
To: rave123
I was glad to hear what you said because I admire both of them very highly. I could not understand how Oprah could not admire C. Rice, considering how intelligent and accomplished both are. I obviously had a misperception, and what you said makes sense; however, it is still difficult to understand why Oprah falls all over movie stars, praising them lavishly--Tom Cruise comes to mind, not that I have anything against him; I don't--but is not lavish in her praise of someone truly remarkable like Condoleeza Rice.
54
posted on
12/03/2003 10:55:21 AM PST
by
Savage Beast
(This is the choice: confrontation or capitulation. Appeasement is capitulation.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson