1 posted on
11/25/2003 6:40:22 PM PST by
amdgmary
To: amdgmary
"We don't need to have a trial, we don't need to have discovery," Felos said.The hell we don't you ghoulish sob.
2 posted on
11/25/2003 6:42:09 PM PST by
jwalsh07
To: amdgmary
It's easier to sway one judge than a jury especially when that jury will talk to the media.
3 posted on
11/25/2003 6:49:36 PM PST by
mtbopfuyn
To: amdgmary
Meanwhile, Bush's lawyers filed an appeal Tuesday to Baird's denial of a motion to dismiss Michael Schiavo's lawsuit. The appeal contends that the lawsuit is invalid because Bush had not been personally served and because it was not filed in Tallahassee where the governor is based. Tuesday's filing argues that all orders entered by the trial court on the Schiavo matter are void, including the court's denial of the motion to dismiss.
It looks as if Jeb is fighting back.
4 posted on
11/25/2003 7:08:31 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: amdgmary
Oh the way they twist words...
What is "artificial hydration?"...Imitation Water?
Michael wants the state to kill his wife so he can get the money designated for Terri's therapy (that he refuses to let her have) and marry the woman he has been shacking up and fathering children with!.
5 posted on
11/25/2003 7:33:01 PM PST by
daffyduct
To: amdgmary
What is HINO afraid of?
The truth?
6 posted on
11/25/2003 8:09:22 PM PST by
msmagoo
To: amdgmary
Michael Schiavo doesn't tell the truth anyway!
9 posted on
11/25/2003 8:39:11 PM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: amdgmary
"The statute robs patients of their right to refuse unwanted - by whom? the loving hubby? Terri can't speak. The only people who say Terri wants to die are those who stand to benefit from her death - medical treatment," the court filings said.
"... When the state so egregiously tramples upon the fundamental rights of its citizens, as in this case, its use of nice sounding explanations such as 'added protection,' has an Orwellian ring."
What is 'Orwellian' is the idea that there is a 'fundamental right' to be starved to death, but no right to live.
...and supporters led by her devoutly Catholic parents have declared Sunday as Terri Schindler day. Catholic congregations nationwide are being encouraged prayers for her...
This news report is framing the issue as if the only ones who advocate for Terri Schiavo's life are doing so because of religious dogma. I count myself amongst those who are against abortion, euthanasia etc. because it is a human rights issue.
Felos frames the issue as if interlopers are interfering with Terri Schiavo's privacy. In fact, we are fighting the idea that a Judge should have the power to decide if a human being is worthy of life based upon expense and convenience.
Trolls who post on these threads saying 'she's a veggie, let her die in peace' never address that aspect. Most of the time they have a truly sad story about a relative who died a lingering death and don't want such a thing for anyone else. Then they say that those of us who advocate erring on the side of life are basing our opinions on emotion.
12 posted on
11/26/2003 4:02:56 PM PST by
walford
(Dogmatism swings both ways)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson