Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timesink
This is a different committee, but I agree. I really think Sean was trying to say it was NOT a staffer, too.

I still want to see the emphasis on content, not on how they leaked. Of course, this may help get the attention of what is in the memos. That kind of attention can not be had if the memos are not in the news. The lamestream media will talk about a pubbie leaker.

30 posted on 11/25/2003 4:14:49 PM PST by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: mathluv; redlipstick
Ah, two different committees! In that case, I'm not going to get worked up about this at all.

I still want to see the emphasis on content, not on how they leaked. Of course, this may help get the attention of what is in the memos. That kind of attention can not be had if the memos are not in the news. The lamestream media will talk about a pubbie leaker.

Good point. They can't whine about the leak without discussing the CONTENT of the leak.

35 posted on 11/25/2003 4:17:22 PM PST by Timesink (I'm not a big fan of electronic stuff, you know? Beeps ... beeps freak me out. They're bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson