To: mathluv; redlipstick
Ah, two different committees! In that case, I'm not going to get worked up about this at all.
I still want to see the emphasis on content, not on how they leaked. Of course, this may help get the attention of what is in the memos. That kind of attention can not be had if the memos are not in the news. The lamestream media will talk about a pubbie leaker.
Good point. They can't whine about the leak without discussing the CONTENT of the leak.
35 posted on
11/25/2003 4:17:22 PM PST by
Timesink
(I'm not a big fan of electronic stuff, you know? Beeps ... beeps freak me out. They're bad.)
To: Timesink
The problem is that this allows the Democrats to frame the Republicans as willing to do anything to win, and to compare this to the Plumbers with Watergate. It will only resonate with the media and Bush haters, but it will get major airplay, unless we get another favor from Michael Jackson, Kobe Bryant or Scott Peterson over the weekend.
38 posted on
11/25/2003 4:20:29 PM PST by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: Timesink
They can't whine about the leak without discussing the CONTENT of the leak.Well, maybe SOME of the content may be mentioned!
39 posted on
11/25/2003 4:20:33 PM PST by
mathluv
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson