The two looked like they were real close.
Posted on 11/25/2003 1:51:37 PM PST by veronica
I paid no attention to the many television programs broadcast this past week on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of President Kennedy’s assassination. The reason for my lack of interest was that the questions about the assassination that had obsessed me all my life—and not only the factual questions, but the deeper moral and emotional issues left by Kennedy’s killing—were resolved for me by Gerald Posner’s 1993 book Case Closed. Here is a letter I wrote to Posner about his book ten years ago, shortly after the 30th anniversary of the assassination: December 15, 1993
Dear Mr. Posner:
I would like to tell you how deeply grateful I am to you for your magnificent book, Case Closed.
Over the years, I had shared the general sense that we did not have the truth about the Kennedy assassination. While I never gave credence to the various wild conspiracy theories, I did feel that there was probably a second gunman, and perhaps Mafia involvement. But it seemed impossible ever to get closer to the truth. A year or two ago there were new television programs and articles about the assassination with some interesting information, but trying to follow the issues that were raised only led one into a morass of confusion.
One of the problems was that, while the conspiracy proponents seemed a contemptible bunch (especially Oliver Stone, who I think is truly evil), the defenders of the Warren Commission report, such as David Belin, also seemed fishy. They just went after the most obvious weaknesses in the conspiracy theories while blandly and self-righteously insisting on the “total correctness” of the obviously flawed Warren report. (It was that same sort of bland defense of the Warren report, the glossing over of its many troubling flaws and gaps, that had helped set off the conspiracy paranoia, along with the general suspicion of our government, back in the mid 1960s.) The Warren defenders never responded to the hard questions that continued to trouble me and everyone else who thought about the issue; and they never seemed to appreciate the fact—which you certainly bring out in your book—that there were many odd events surrounding the assassination that could reasonably give rise to suspicions of a conspiracy. It was all terribly, deeply frustrating. It seemed that this mystery would last forever, and that there was no point in even trying to figure it out.
Then one day this past September, at the National Airport in Washington, D.C., I picked up the U.S. News and World Report with the long excerpt from Case Closed. Reading the article on the shuttle flight back to New York, I experienced an epiphany. The clarity of your presentation, your story of Oswald, the fascinating new information about the timing of the shots and many other things all added up to an account that for the first time in all these years had the ring of truth. The magazine excerpt, of course, did not answer all my questions (I had to wait to read the book for that), but it did satisfy me that Oswald did it alone. Oswald emerged as a totally believable, real person, not this shadowy figure upon whom the conspiracy theorists could cast any fantasy they wanted.
There is another, perhaps unintended, benefit of Case Closed. Reading it made me realize that for years, all the bedeviling issues surrounding the assassination had blocked the assassination itself—the horror and tragedy and poignancy of it—from full consciousness. The conspiracy theories had become the main historical event, not Kennedy’s terrible death and what it did to the country. But your account, by clearing away those questions, has restored the assassination itself as an event in my experience and I think our collective experience as well. It was as though I began feeling the trauma and the meaning of Kennedy’s death afresh, undiminished after three decades.
Apart from the tragedy of the event itself, it was truly a fateful turning point in our country’s history—but, I believe, in a sense exactly opposite to what Oliver Stone imagines. Rather than marking the rise of Stone’s fictional militaristic right-wing to national power, it marked the rise to influence of a left-wing culture of alienation typified by people like Oliver Stone himself. These members of the adversary culture, unable to absorb Kennedy’s murder as the terrible event it was, chose to see it as a confirmation that America itself was evil, that America would always block the exaggerated hopes for unlimited individual fulfillment and social progress that Kennedy seemed to personify for many people. It was shortly after Kennedy’s death that the deadly notion became current that the “system” was blame for everything, thus turning Americans against their own country. Of course, the rise of black rage, the Vietnam war and so on were also important parts of this historic catastrophe, but the Kennedy assassination was crucial.
The unresolved assassination puzzle also fed the alienating notion that truth is indeterminable, that all we can know are self-serving narratives. This idea opens the gates to all kinds of viciousness. For example, the egregious Stone could present his paranoid fantasy as a revelation of “hidden truth” to a mass audience of millions of unformed, suggestible minds, and at the same time cover himself with the elites by saying that his movie was a mere “counter-myth,” not intended to be a factual presentation. Thus he got to convince millions of people that horrible lies were the truth, while denying that that he was doing anything of the kind. With Case Closed, you have not only uncovered the specific truth of the assassination; you’ve demonstrated that truth itself exists and can be known.
But for me, what is most remarkable about Case Closed is that this old festering sore of uncertainty and discouragement surrounding the assassination, which I never expected to be cured, has been cured. In bringing the truth to light out of all that confusion, you have performed not only a great public service, but a heroic act.
Sincerely yours,
Lawrence Auster
The two looked like they were real close.
Im talking about the brain matter
This can't be true. I must have seen least 10 different conspiracy theories on TV this past weekend.
That he might and then you would do research on what he was claiming and find out that he misquotes, misleads, and makes things up. The only verifiable cases of lies and deceit in this case have all been done by conspiracy authors.
For examples of how this applies to Wecht, you might want to read:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/wecht.txt
In which Dr. Robert Artwohl takes Wecht to task for several mistakes and omissions and darned if the good doctor didn't have a response to Artwohl's questions. In fact, he seemed rather miffed at being challenged.
Not true. The 'Report' did not prove that, and 39 years of reasonable doubt exists, unrefuted.
Eyewitness accounts place him in the window several seconds before and after the shooting and at least one eyewitness saw him shoot.
BS speculation, unsupported by even the Report itself. There are no credible ID's of Oswald in the window. Never have been.
Film exists of a figure in the window seven seconds before the first shot wearing clothing similar to what Oswald was wearing at work that day.
"Similar" proves nothing. So much for your eyewitless 'proof'.
Forensics has proven that the first shot missed, the second hit Kennedy, went through him and hit Connally, the third shot hit Kennedy in the upper right side of the back of his head and blew his brains out the right front side of his head.
The Reports forensic theories have been debated/debunked ad nauseum since they were published. Your repetitions add nothing.
The book you cite, "Case Open" looks like a "fringe" book.
It critiques 'Case Closed' with detailed facts, still unaddressed by Posner, or any other of the Report's 'single bullet theorists'; ---- who are becoming just as fanatical on this issue as the radical conspiracy buffs.
Rational folks can only hope for a pox on both your houses.
Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-Forward at the moment of impact-
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.