[little jeremiah]

Nope, my in-my-own words definition of "theocracy" was one I remembered from another dictionary. Then I quoted Webster's which supported my first definition.

You (as most "liberaltarians" I have attempted to debate with) cannot debate fairly; meaning cannot debate using facts and evidence.
All you can do is juggle words, name-call, and spout slogans and libertarian cant. Just like the "liberals" you claim to be so different from. Besmirch the messenger ("Taliban", etc) but as usual, libertarians (as befits of one of the many brands of utopians) cannot debate facts. The conversation quickly degrades into your side name calling, innuendo, belittling, and so on.

Come up with some reasoned debate or go back to your bong.

And if you don't like that kind of argument, stop using that kind of argument.

[Protagoras]

You have just described your own style. An unexplained dementia has set in. A disconnect with reality.

[Protagoras]

What was your screen name before you resigned up 10 days ago? How many times have you been banned? Inquiring minds want to know. LOL