[scripter]

I agree, I just wonder why you feel compelled to tell me this.

First, I have no idea you might agree based on your previous posts today. Second, Being this is a public forum, I'm not just talking to you.

So does obesity and other forms of hetrosexual contact. Your proposal on those?

Ah, that argument. Now I have a better idea of your mindset. No behaviorally obtained health hazards compare to those of the homosexual lifestyle. That is, anything that shortens the lifespan and is contagious to the point of death to those who are infected. Does obesity threaten the blood supply? No. Do we have television shows celebrating obesity? No. Do we have organizations in the schools encouraging kids to try obesity? No. I mean, how do kids know they wouldn't enjoy being obese if they've never tried it? The same arguments are valid for your reference to other forms of hetrosexual contact.

I'm not sure what that has to do with anything in this conversation. Child molestations violate rights, that's why they are subject to legitimate government force.

It's this thing called context. The title of the article is The Perverted State Of America and I've documented quite well that homosexuals are more prone to molest children. You're talking about rights and folks who are more prone to molest children. If you can't see what that has to do with the subject, you're not very bright (and I know that's not the case), unable to put the two together, or you're being disingenuous. I'd like to give you the benefit of the doubt since we agree on some issues, but some of your responses tell me that may not be of benefit.

Off topic and irrelevant to this conversation. I happen to agree, but why are you telling me about it?

Off topic? C'mon Protagoras, you said our rights aren't being voilated so it's none of our business. Again, in listing the severe health hazards of the homosexual lifestyle I documented quite well just why it is our business.

I think perhaps some can, but again, it's off topic to this conversation.

Those who want to change can change. And again, it is not off topic as we're talking about a behavior that affects the entire world. A behavior that can be changed.

Tolerate? Like not kill them? Like not arrest them?

Talk about playing with words. In your own words: Grow up, son. Grow up, boy. You are demented.. Hopefully you just missed what I said...

I never said tolerate homosexuals as you imply above, I said homosexuality. It's the behavior that we shouldn't tolerate, it's the homosexuality that we shouldn't accept. Why should we tolerate a behavior that is pushed on our kids as acceptable, valid and normal when it is so dangerous, when it can kill? Homosexuals themselves must be accepted for the human beings that they are.

I agree, what have you done about it lately? (Encourage doesn't mean at the point of a gun.)

If you don't know what I'm doing to encourage homosexuals to leave their lifestyle, you're not paying attention. Oh yeah, I like the reference to pointing a gun. Nice. I previously said:

And those who truly care for homosexuals will do just that.

I agree. Get going if you haven't already.

You're not paying attention.

[US admirer]

Not to nit-pick but your statement: “No behaviorally obtained health hazards compare to those of the homosexual lifestyle” is arguably if not clearly incorrect. Excess food and alcohol intake is responsible for the consumption of billions of dollars of yours and my money that deprive us of funding for the treatment and prevention of other conditions. Also, “behaviorally obtained” high ethanol intake is responsible for much sorrow and suffering of others, more so than homos induce, I would wager.

[Protagoras]

First, I have no idea you might agree based on your previous posts today.

I guess you read into them what you thought they meant. Maybe you weren't paying attention.

The same arguments are valid for your reference to other forms of hetrosexual contact.

Not even close. Aids and almost all health issues caused by homsexual contact are true of hetrosexual contact. In fact, name one std which can't be transmitted between men and women. But nice try on the obesity response.

As for the benefit of the doubt on me, keep it. I'm uninterested in your approval.

Again, in listing the severe health hazards of the homosexual lifestyle I documented quite well just why it is our business.

Since refuted. Keep your self celibate outside of marriage and have your wife do the same and you will have no problems. Raise your children correctly and you will have no problems.

As to not tolerating the behavior, check YOUR context. We are talking about government force, not your approval. How would you not "tolerate" homosexuality in the context of government force?

Oh yeah, I like the reference to pointing a gun.

Sorry, but I feel compelled to point out to many folks that which is obvious to most. Namely, government is force. It is their job. It is their tool. Guns are their chosen weapon for enforcment most of the time. Sorry if you have to be constantly reminded of that.

I'm paying attention. Now have a nice day, time to go for the holiday.