Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClintonBeGone
If the deed restrictions said no residential development, how is the group or county wrong for enforcing a written contract?

It didn't say no residential development. It said that the land was to be used as a farm. It's fairly common for a farmer to have a house for himself on his farmland.

60 posted on 11/25/2003 6:08:47 PM PST by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Mannaggia l'America
It didn't say no residential development. It said that the land was to be used as a farm. It's fairly common for a farmer to have a house for himself on his farmland.

Same difference. These conservation easements are usually very clear. They don't want the property to be used to live on, just farmed, or as a park, etc. While you and I think every cute little farm deserves a farm house, in the legal sense that's simply not allowed if the deed or logical interpretation of its langague doesn't permit.

69 posted on 11/26/2003 4:19:22 AM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson