[ClintonBeGone]

It didn't say no residential development. It said that the land was to be used as a farm. It's fairly common for a farmer to have a house for himself on his farmland.

Same difference. These conservation easements are usually very clear. They don't want the property to be used to live on, just farmed, or as a park, etc. While you and I think every cute little farm deserves a farm house, in the legal sense that's simply not allowed if the deed or logical interpretation of its langague doesn't permit.

[Mannaggia l'America]

Same difference. These conservation easements are usually very clear. They don't want the property to be used to live on, just farmed, or as a park, etc. While you and I think every cute little farm deserves a farm house, in the legal sense that's simply not allowed if the deed or logical interpretation of its langague doesn't permit.

I guess you didn't read the article I linked to.

In 1989, a judge ruled that a farmhouse was acceptable based on the language in the deed, and he built it based on that ruling.

But the greenies didn't like it and found a judge in 1995 who would overturn the ruling. They bulldozed his house the next day.

[GladesGuru]

Sorry, but you seem to have developed a liking for knee-capping your own arguments. Such buildings as are normal and necessary for farming related activities are allowed. Only under socialism influenced judges are legal traditions stretching back to the times when our ancestors achieved status as humans not just as the chattel of the nobility, so casually disgarded.

Unfortunately, since the "acceptance" of socialism such fatuous legalisms been accepted. Arguably, it is time to retake AMerica and deal with such treasonous premises and those who made a career of destroying both their fellow Americans and the basic premises of the Republic.

For the socialism impaired - socialism is antithetical to the basic premises of the Republic. Advocacy of socialism, except in the context of a call for a Constitutional Amendment allowing socialism is treason. Check the definitions. Words have meanings, really - they do!

Here in the Sheeples Republic of FloriDUH, legalisms like you just tried are somewhat accepted. But the public outrage is rising, and soon we too shall be free of those who took their premises, motives, and marching orders from the likes of Warren Z. Foster.

One more election cycle and the socialists will be out. Too bad we didn't have the backbone to hang them slowly from tree branches (but with organic, hemp ropes!) as the treasonous have traditionally been dealt with.