Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Refuting the Cynics
The New York Times ^ | November 25, 2003 | By DAVID BROOKS

Posted on 11/25/2003 10:46:01 AM PST by .cnI redruM

The Economist magazine recently observed that in the 40 years following World War II, "America and Europe seemed to be growing more like one another in almost every way that matters." Demographically, economically and politically, the United States and Europe seemed to be converging.

Then, around the middle of the 1980's, the U.S. and Europe started to diverge. The American work ethic shifted, so that the average American now works 350 hours a year — 9 or 10 weeks — longer than the average European.

American fertility rates bottomed out around 1985, and began rising. Native-born American women now have almost two children on average, while the European rate is 1.4 children per woman and falling.

Economically, the comparisons are trickier, but here too there is divergence. The gap between American and European G.D.P. per capita has widened over the past two decades, and at the moment American productivity rates are surging roughly 5 percent a year.

The biggest difference is that over the past two decades the United States has absorbed roughly 20 million immigrants. This influx of people has led, in the short term, to widening inequality and higher welfare costs as the immigrants are absorbed, but it also means that the U.S. will be, through our lifetimes, young, ambitious and energetic.

Working off U.N. and U.S. census data, Bill Frey, the indispensable University of Michigan demographer, projects that in the year 2050 the median age in the United States will be 35. The median age in Europe will be 52. The implications of that are enormous.

As we settle down to the Thanksgiving table in a few days, we might remind ourselves that whatever other problems grip our country, lack of vitality is not one of them. In fact, we may look back on the period beginning in the middle of the 1980's as the Great Rejuvenation. American life has improved in almost every measurable way, and far from regressing toward the mean, the U.S. has become a more exceptional nation.

The drop in crime rates over the past decade is nothing short of a miracle. Teenage pregnancy and abortion rates rose in the early 1970's and 1980's, then leveled off and now are dropping. Child poverty rates have declined since the welfare reform of the mid-1990's. The black poverty rate dropped "to the lowest rate ever recorded," according to a 2002 study by the National Urban League. The barren South Bronx neighborhood that Ronald Reagan visited in 1980 to illustrate urban blight is now a thriving area, with, inevitably, a Starbucks.

The U.S. economy has enjoyed two long booms in the past two decades, interrupted by two shallow recessions, and perhaps now we're at the start of a third boom. More nations have become democratic in the past two decades than at any other time in history.

In his forthcoming book, "The Progress Paradox," Gregg Easterbrook piles on the happy tidings. The air is cleaner. The water is cleaner and we are using less of it. Our homes have doubled in size in a generation and home ownership rates are at an all-time high. There are now fewer highway deaths in the U.S. than in 1970, even though the number of miles driven has shot up by 75 percent.

Obviously, huge problems remain. But the overwhelming weight of the evidence suggests that despite all the ugliness of our politics, this is a well-governed nation. The trends of the past two decades stand as howling refutation of those antipolitical cynics who have become more scathing about government even as the results of our policies have been impressive. The evidence also rebukes those gloomy liberals who for two decades have been predicting that the center-right governance of Reagan, Bush, Clinton and Bush would lead to disaster.

Most of all, the evidence rebuts the cultural critics of the right and left, who have bemoaned the rise of narcissism, cultural relativism, greed, and on and on. And while many of these critics have made valid points, if you relied on their work you would have a horribly distorted view of the state of this nation.

In his book, Easterbrook seeks to explain why we feel gloomy even as things go well. I would only add that the beginning of political wisdom in times like these is realistic optimism, and the proper emotion at this season is, as always, gratitude.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: davidbrooks; optimism; recenthistory
What? We're Not Doomed? How people can remain so utterly pessimistic over at CNN and the DNC is beyond me.
1 posted on 11/25/2003 10:46:02 AM PST by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
I can't believe this has been printed in the NY Times!
2 posted on 11/25/2003 10:53:30 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("To freedom, Alberta, horses . . . and women!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
The biggest difference is that over the past two decades the United States has absorbed roughly 20 million immigrants.

God bless the legals!

3 posted on 11/25/2003 10:54:39 AM PST by God is good (Till we meet in the golden city of the New Jerusalem, peace to my brothers and sisters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Someone actually said the word "graditude" in the pages of the New York Times. Without meaning it as a slur or putting it in scare quotes. Holy crabapples batman, we are registering hits...
4 posted on 11/25/2003 11:03:13 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
The New York Times used to have a stricter editorial policy banning signs of optimism and hope.
5 posted on 11/25/2003 11:08:31 AM PST by .cnI redruM (The social agenda of the Democratic Party reminds me of a creepy XXX fetish show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I can't believe this has been printed in the NY Times!

I can. Only the Times (or the Post, or LA Times, or . . . well, okay, lots of places) could call Clinton 'center-right'. Better to have said, "the center-right governance initiated by Reagan and continued once Clinton lost control of Congress for the Democrats." Any reasonable analysis of what actually happened would see the Bush I years belong with Clinton as decided left of center. Thankfully, the Congress - despite the RINOs - remains moderate. That means, it's in line with the majority of the country. To the Times, that's extreme-right of course.
6 posted on 11/25/2003 11:16:03 AM PST by Gorjus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
> In fact, we may look back on the period beginning in
> the middle of the 1980's as the Great Rejuvenation.

Let's see now. Who was President then?
7 posted on 11/25/2003 11:27:28 AM PST by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
My only quibble is with the statement that the American work ethic shifted so we now work so many more hours than the Europeans. We've always been hard-working. It's the Europeans who've become lazy. The French would rather let their own grandmothers die of heat stroke than cut their vacations short, and they'll go on strike and shut down their countries if anyone in the government suggests they give up a couple of their many paid days off in order to prevent an economic collapse.

I'm third-generation self-employed and haven't had an actual, away-from-home vacation in five years. I can't even imagine having the attitude that someone has an obligation to pay me money to sit on my butt and do nothing.

8 posted on 11/25/2003 12:12:21 PM PST by HHFi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jim_trent
The Reagan Rejuvination. That has a certain rhetorical ring. Don't you think?
9 posted on 11/25/2003 12:13:26 PM PST by .cnI redruM (The social agenda of the Democratic Party reminds me of a creepy XXX fetish show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HHFi
I'd tend to agree. Most US workers expect to work when at work, and will be willing to spend more time there in return for suitable compensation. At least that's what I've noticed when I've been tasked with supervising or directing non-public sector employees.
10 posted on 11/25/2003 12:15:06 PM PST by .cnI redruM (The social agenda of the Democratic Party reminds me of a creepy XXX fetish show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Amazing from the Times.
11 posted on 11/25/2003 12:17:58 PM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson