To: tacticalogic
I would tend to think that the WoD necessarily involves a seperate debate on "clear and present danger," and I see that debate as counterproductive to this discussion. The SCOTUS has done very little legislating from the bench that dealt with drugs.
97 posted on
11/25/2003 2:28:01 PM PST by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does)
To: presidio9
I would tend to think that the WoD necessarily involves a seperate debate on "clear and present danger," and I see that debate as counterproductive to this discussion. The SCOTUS has done very little legislating from the bench that dealt with drugs.I think the questions are relevant to the general topic of the "Living Constitution" doctrine, and developing a consistently applicable defense against it. I wasn't aware the discussion was confined to only discussing it wrt SCOTUS legislating from the bench.
108 posted on
11/25/2003 2:54:24 PM PST by
tacticalogic
(Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson