[John Robinson]

How do underlines/no underlines look for visit status? (I'd get clobbered if I didn't have that for the thread links.)

[Admin Moderator]

I like it.

[glock rocks]

That would work... just so I can somehow discern them.

[my_pointy_head_is_sharp]

We didn't use to have that. Why do we need it now? Is there a way you can do it, so that we can circumvent it by our own computer settings - such as "Ignore Colors Specified on Web Pages"?

[smith288]

I think it looks pretty good... (you wont please everyone)

[BlessedBeGod]

How do underlines/no underlines look for visit status?

That looks better! :-)

[my_pointy_head_is_sharp]

OK, I set my computer to Ignore Specified Colors. Now virtually everything is blue. Did we have that much blue before? The post number is blue, our names are blue, the Post Reply/Private Reply/etc. is all blue. And a bright blue, at that. Maybe if you made it a darker blue.

But still, I don't remember that much blue before.

[Dog Gone]

How do underlines/no underlines look for visit status?

Not good. It needs to be consistent with web protocol and change color.

Otherwise you're going to get a million complaints from people wondering why some threads aren't underlined.

[my_pointy_head_is_sharp]

Oh, I didn't know you had it up there. The underlines don't bother me. I could live with that. What bothers me is all the blue. Blue titles everywhere. Way too much bright blue. (Can't we go back to the way it was?)

[LikeLight]

What's with the horrible black underlining for visited threads!!! This morning I was loving your changes. Now the whole place looks sick! The light blue bar with standard color change for visited threads was very nice. Now it's ugly as sin.