[_Jim]

The Official Lie

ONE wonders how you 'picked' up this opinion, SINCE there were so few copies of the Warren Report published hence it's HIGHLY UNLIKELY you have EVER even LAID eyes on this volumous work and FORMED that opinion yourself. Nowadays, it's available for access on the web, but, STILL, few read this primary document.

THE prevalence of this opinion (The 'Lie'), of course, is PARAMOUNT in every conspiracy work produced to this date.

Little does the average 'consumer' of conspiracy crapola REALIZE that the VAST amount of the WC Report is comprised of interviews from citizens, et cetra, and NOT simply one large opinion piece written by 'the govt' (as the conspiracy kooks would have THE PUBLIC believe).

[justshutupandtakeit]

Many of the depositions and interviews are available on the web. I have read many of them and continue to do so. So far none have proven ANYTHING except that the interviewers seemed to waste a tremendous amount of time on irrelevencies and steer clear of areas that could be too embarrassing to the Official Lie. Some contrary statements are even included such as those of Officer Baker and Roy Truly wrt Oswald's whereabouts immediately following the shots.

I have read dozens of books about this, some are interesting and raise valid questions, some are nonsense and irrelevent to the issues but one of the most deceptive is the Posner. It does not stand much scrutiny. I have read the summary of the Report published after the entire document was released.

Still haven't answered the question I posed as to how a rifle which broken down has a 34" component smuggled into the TBD in a package no more than 22" long? It is not necessary to read the entire 26 volumes to wonder about this.

I doubt that YOU have read all 26 volumes either. But that has not caused me to attempt to dismiss your concerns with supporting the Report. Nor have I insinuated that you are a professional apologist or Shooter 2.5 either.

[Shooter 2.5]

Do you notice they never once say, "Here's a picture of something and I disagree with it? It's always some silly statement that we have to prove wrong.