[raisincane]

I watched History Channel with documentary featuring Oswald's mistress. She claims Oswald was there, by his own ommission to her the day before, to shot the killer. Her story was compelling, but who knows?

[HuntsvilleTxVeteran]

What????

[hotpotato]

She claims Oswald was there, by his own ommission to her the day before, to shot the killer.

uhm... could you try that again in a way that we could probably understand what you are saying?

[Brandon]

I watched the same show, with my 16 year old son, whose interest in the matter is purely historical. About halfway through, he went into the kitchen and came back with a roll of aluminum foil, and proceeded to fashion hats for both of us. THat was his sole commentary, but I think it's reasonable. Did you notice that not one single shred of corroborating evidence was offered to back up this woman's story? No secondary witnesses, either -- everyone she named who might have been able to verify or debunk her claims is rather conveniently dead. She struck me as a publicity hound, anxious to grab a moment in the spotlight by claiming to be Oswald's lover.

[churchillbuff]

She claims Oswald was there, by his own ommission to her the day before, to shot the killer. Her story was compelling, but who knows?

Please clarify: Oswald's role was to kill another sniper?

[Protagoras]

Huh?

[RightWhale]

She claims Oswald was there, by his own ommission to her the day before, to shot the killer.

Would it be possible to rephrase this sentence and perhaps expand it somewhat so it is clearer?

[I'm ALL Right!]

Saw that too...very compelling. I don't know what to believe, too many stories out there. HOWEVER, that woman was either psychotic and a really good liar, or she was telling the truth. Hmmmmmmmm I'd believe her before I believe the gov't.