Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Secret Pentagon memo details Saddam-bin Laden ties
AFP ^ | 11/24/03

Posted on 11/24/2003 6:42:48 AM PST by TexKat

WASHINGTON (AFP) - A conservative US magazine said it had obtained a classified US government memo purporting to prove that the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein had contacts with al-Qaeda and was implicated in the September 11, 2001 attacks.

"Much of the evidence is detailed, conclusive, and corroborated by multiple sources," says an article in Monday's edition of The Weekly Standard.

"The picture that emerges is one of a history of collaboration between two of America's most determined and dangerous enemies."

However a skeptical commentary on the Weekly Standard article in Newsweek magazine suggests the Pentagon (news - web sites) memo was intentionally leaked "to shore up the Bush administration's prewar claims and defuse the intelligence committee investigation into allegations of the misuse of intelligence."

The top secret memo, dated October 23, 2003, detailed intelligence on contacts between the Iraqi government and al-Qaeda over the past decade, the magazine said.

The memo was sent by Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith to leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee, who had requested evidence of Iraq-al-Qaeda ties as part of a probe into intelligence used to justify the war on Iraq.

Many critics of the war say US allegations of a link between Saddam and the September 11, 2001 terror attacks on Washington and New York remain unproven.

And on September 17 this year, President George W. Bush himself admitted that there were no known links.

"We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September the 11th," Bush said.

The Pentagon memo quoted by the Weekly Standard lists 50 pieces of intelligence gathered from domestic and foreign agencies including the FBI, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the National Security Agency.

"Some of it is new information obtained in custodial interviews with high-level al-Qaeda terrorists and Iraqi officials, and some of it is more than a decade old," the magazine said.

The first meetings between the Iraqi Intelligence Services (IIS) and al-Qaeda took place from 1992 to 1995 in Sudan, the memo says, citing a senior Iraqi intelligence officer debriefed in May 2003. "Additional meetings between Iraqi intelligence and al Qaeda were held in Pakistan."

Bin Laden received training on bomb making from Iraqi explosives expert Brigadier Salim al-Ahmed, who was seen on his farm in Khartoum in 1995 and 1996, the memo says, citing a "well-placed source."

Senior al-Qaeda operative Ayman al-Zawahiri met with Iraq's vice president on February 3, 1998 in Baghdad to discuss coordination between Iraq and al-Qaeda, and the establishment of "camps" in Nasiriyah and Iraqi Kurdistan, the memo claims.

"According to sensitive reporting, Saddam personally sent Faruq Hijazi, IIS deputy director and later ambassador to Turkey, to meet with bin Laden at least twice, first in Sudan and later in Afghanistan (news - web sites) in 1999," it says.

The contacts continued until the eve of the US invasion of Iraq, though intelligence reports from mid-1999 to 2003 "are conflicting," the Standard says.

In late 2002, al-Qaeda operative Abu Musab al Zarqawi "was setting up sleeper cells in Baghdad to be activated in case of a US occupation of the city," the memo says.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Washington; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaedaandiraq; feithmemo; saddamoblties; usgovmemo

AFP running the story now.

1 posted on 11/24/2003 6:42:49 AM PST by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TexKat
AFP notes Newsweek's skepticism, but neither Newsweek -- which is carrying the DNC's water -- nor AFP have been able to discredit the report.
2 posted on 11/24/2003 6:49:42 AM PST by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
Now if we could turn our attention to the secret Saddam-bin Laden -- SAUDI ARABIA ties maybe we'd get someplace....
3 posted on 11/24/2003 6:51:10 AM PST by armadale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
I'm sure someone will correct me, but this is such horrid logic it makes me nauseous. (I think it's a false modus ponens? Whatever....it's wrong!)

The top secret memo, dated October 23, 2003, detailed intelligence on contacts between the Iraqi government and al-Qaeda over the past decade.......
And on September 17 this year, President George W. Bush himself admitted that there were no known links. "We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September the 11th," Bush said.

B does NOT imply A!!! The two statements are totally consistent, yet they are written up as mutually exclusive.

4 posted on 11/24/2003 7:07:31 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
You are totally right. I was looking at the same thing. Typical liberal twisted speak.
5 posted on 11/24/2003 7:17:23 AM PST by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
The Newsweak article has already been shredded by a followup article in the Weekly Standard, posted here yesterday. It's the usual non sequiturs and lies.

Naturally Agence France Presse shares Chirac's devotion to Saddam Hussein and his (now lost) moneybags.
6 posted on 11/24/2003 7:23:41 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
Memo Bump!
7 posted on 11/24/2003 7:34:16 AM PST by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

Amazing what turns up from the searchs on Free Republic.


8 posted on 06/18/2004 12:14:40 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Did I do that? LOL!!


9 posted on 06/18/2004 1:42:39 PM PDT by TexKat (Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson