Skip to comments.
Jacko's the sick king of
industry that preys on kids
New York Daily News ^
| 11/24/03
| Stanley Crouch
Posted on 11/24/2003 2:41:08 AM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
11/24/2003 2:41:08 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
"Clarence Clemons' observation that to be successful in rock you need to look black but sound white."
I always thought it was the opposite. Look at Elvis Presley and Maria Carey.
To: kattracks
to be the King of Pop is to be the King of Pedophilia
If we accept this premise, that
it's all pedophilia, then we are forced to either:
a) take actual pedophilia less seriously
or
b) institute Taliban laws against music and dancing.
3
posted on
11/24/2003 3:50:30 AM PST
by
samtheman
To: kattracks
FoxNews reported on the sexually explicit "love letters" Jacko wrote to this kid. The police have them all now. He's toast.....because he's guilty. The whole picture fits - Jackson (as with most who practice perverted sex) lacked father-love all his life. The young boy went along too because he too has the same lack in his own life. It's another lesson of how important fathers are in the lives of their children - both boys AND girls.
Now....how long before someone comes along with the "innocent until proven guilty" theme? As if I would be a juror, and therefore have no right to a single thought on the matter!
To: kattracks
Our children are told that hostility, vulgarity, shock and sex are the weapons that best express their freedom from the adults who - hidden inside the industry like the Wizard of Oz - are setting them up to consume even more demeaning products. Absolutely true. That doesn't excuse this individual performer's behavior, of course, but in a sense, he got into trouble for really doing what he was essentially selling all along.
5
posted on
11/24/2003 3:56:16 AM PST
by
livius
To: kattracks
Only a matter of time before some Hollywood fruitcake compares this to McCarthyism.
6
posted on
11/24/2003 4:04:52 AM PST
by
Prodigal Son
("Fundamentalist Left". It's a great meme. Spread it.)
To: Prodigal Son
I bet if we did Lexis-Nexis search, we'd find that it has already occurred.
7
posted on
11/24/2003 4:08:24 AM PST
by
FreedomPoster
(this space intentionally blank)
To: samtheman
Music and dancing have existed for thousands of years.
The New Disney has existed for less than twenty.
Getting parents up to speed on what NewDisney and its "entertainment" brothers are all about does not at all require banning music and dancing.
8
posted on
11/24/2003 4:11:54 AM PST
by
Jim Noble
To: I still care
I agree - black singers don't have to sound white to make it. Also the writer states that Jackson's facial surgeries helped make him the King of Pop - I think Jackson has hurt himself by changing his looks. No telling what he could have been if he had stayed the course back in his "Beat It" and "Thriller" days (His looks had already changed but not extremely).
9
posted on
11/24/2003 4:19:57 AM PST
by
gingerky
To: kattracks
I thought I heard that Lisa Marie said she got a "heap'o good lovin" while bedding with The King of Pop. And you know what they say about black men in the bedroom. His nose might be smaller.....
10
posted on
11/24/2003 4:58:30 AM PST
by
whereasandsoforth
(tagged for migratory purposes only)
To: gingerky
I agree that it's hurt him, not helped. I was at a party Saturday and a female friend of ours said she'd just seen the "Thriller" video for the first time in years, and it shocked her. She said she had forgotten how handsome and athletic Michael was back then, and to be suddenly reminded of that when she had the image of what he's done to himself since in her mind just made her feel sad and sick. He may have to get one of those new British face transplants and start all over from scratch. Although I doubt they'll offer that procedure in the prison infirmary.
11
posted on
11/24/2003 4:59:13 AM PST
by
HHFi
To: HHFi
He may have to get one of those new British face transplants and start all over from scratch. Although I doubt they'll offer that procedure in the prison infirmary. Maybe not in the infirmary, but after some time in the Yard, he will probably look a lot different.
Though with his money that will never happen...He'll be at some golf camp/country club/house arrest.
Here is what I fail to understand: If someone ever accused me of abusing children whether I was innocent or guilty, I would never, never allow myself to be in the company of a child, ever again, thereafter. Yet, escaping the earlier allegation(s), he dove right back in. This baffles me.
12
posted on
11/24/2003 5:07:37 AM PST
by
Gorzaloon
(Contents may have settled during shipping, but this tagline contains the stated product weight.)
To: kattracks
This from the Daily News?
They also had the courage to print the names of the savage football players who attacked their younger teammates from Mepham High School
13
posted on
11/24/2003 5:09:02 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: kattracks; MeeknMing
Robert Wegner, Michael's chief of security at Neverland, just said the DA has a good, strong case.
He said he "told everybody" back in '93 that Michael would strike again.
He said he has personally heard at least one other kid to "Go F- Off!" when Mikey was trying to hump one of them out behind the house at NLand.
He first suspected Mikey when he saw kids sleeping with him.
He said nobody at the ranch would talk about the pedophelia (they covered for Mikey) and that he was building a case when Mike got busted the first time.
He is the author of My Three Years With Michael Jackson.
This came out this morning on the Today Show.
14
posted on
11/24/2003 5:18:24 AM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
To: kattracks; Betty Jo
The mob is known to be involved in child pornography and prostitution, as well as in the entertainment industry. No wonder mobster Malnik paid Jackson's bail, and tough guy Pellicano was the muscle in the '93 case.
To: kattracks
Time for a
Jarvis Cocker bump:
The Brit Awards, 1996. Michael Jackson, dressed in white and bathed in celestial light, is healing poverty-stricken children onstage. At least, that's the idea behind the ludicrous stage show for the megastar's turgid 'Earth Song' - everyone at home just sees one man's grotesque delusions and some stage-school brats. By the time Jackson "blesses" an actor portraying a rabbi, "ludicrous" has become plain offensive.
Luckily for the nation, there was a man on the inside - Pulp's Jarvis Cocker, enjoying a post-'Common People' popularity wave that meant he could have walked into any British household and successfully demanded tea and sexual favours. Appalled by Jackson's self-aggrandisement, Jarvis leapt onstage, pretended to flash his skinnily iconic arse, had a dance, then sat back down. It was only at the aftershow party that he was asked to accompany police to the station, accused of assaulting child performers. The country awoke to breakfast news telling them that their adorably camp hero was actually a child-walloping thug. Of course, it quickly became apparent Jarvis had been deliberately maligned. "I do not go onstage and start shovelling kids over barriers because that's not my style," he announced, with characteristic flair.
A huge show of public support followed. The contrast was clear: Jackson was out of touch, humourless and artistically bankrupt; Jarvis, leader of the common people, was reckless, righteous and did what every viewer would have done. It was a shining example of how great pop stars possess an innate sense of what is expected of them. Jarvis Cocker, in all his arse-waggling glory, was never going to be Jesus Christ. But at least he had the right initials.
-Eric
16
posted on
11/24/2003 5:27:06 AM PST
by
E Rocc
(And people wonder why some of us think British pop is a hundred times cooler than American.)
To: anniegetyourgun
- Jackson (as with most who practice perverted sex) lacked father-love all his life. The young boy went along too because he too has the same lack in his own life. It's another lesson of how important fathers are in the lives of their children - both boys AND girls. Did you see how Jackson got the current accuser to call him "Daddy"?
To: aristeides
I'm still working on the Malnik-mob-Saudi trail.This financial data base will be part of the never ending investigation of Jackson.
I am betting that the feds are into it right now.
It is going to get real bizzaro when Carlyle rears its ugly head.
So many of the Saudi royals are into Bush business deals via Carlyle and this Malkin-mob-Saudi connection is no exception.
Reading of Michaels finances is like tracking down the terrorists finances.
18
posted on
11/24/2003 6:16:08 AM PST
by
Betty Jo
To: kattracks
The "entertainment" industry is rife with homosexuals and other sorts of sexual deviants. I hear that paris hilton is now going to "star" in some prime time show where she goes and lives with a normal family.... what timing.... just after the internet release of her porn movie.
To: Jim Noble
I agree. It isn't music and dancing that are the problems here. IMO, music and dancing are an important part of life, not to be banned. It is the meida that needs a good scolding here.
ie:The Cat in The Hat-now showing. Do we really need to take a child's classic ,which is used as a learning tool , to present an R rated movie.
Can't Hollywood come up with their own story lines to sell sex, and ranchy hummor. If they wanted to saterize a child's classic for the entertainment of adults, why are they selling this movie to kids as young as 5?
This is schizophrenia. But I guess there are enough confused adults out there who will support this garbage. I suspect the majority of the people who paid good money to see this movie this weekend are the simple minded who are being fed an old favorite with sex, so they will finally enjoy it, or they want to see sex, and they want to pat themselves on the back for helping their child learn to read at the same time.
I see this movie did $40 million yesterday. It isn't just that the movie industry and their cohorts who are peddling smut to kiddies that are the downfall of polite society, it is the vary parentss, who will gladly take part in corrupting their own children, and pay for it to be done, who should look in the mirror. Parents who are trying to be cool will take a child, who is too young to comprehend sex ,and the impacts of sex and sexual hummor to see a movie based on a learning tool, but full of nonesense sex and adult hummor. Then these same people complain about how their 13 year old is provocative, distand and dis-intrested in being serious.
When peopel fill their child's life full of sexual overtones and adult situations, they should not be surprised when the kid is looking for love in all the worng places, and ignores boundries later in life.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson