To: All
I need to ask a question and at the moment I'm not sure if it was being talked about here or on one of the others posts. What was the final outcome of Judge J. Crockett Farnells ruling.? Will there be a depostion of the radiaologist or not?? If the judge did rule in favor of the deposition I think it would be nice for someone to post his e-mail address and we all thank him. We spam the ones who rule against Terri so we should praise Judge Farnell if he ruled in favor of her. Who knows he might be our Judge Sanders Saul that was so fair during the recount.
29 posted on
11/24/2003 12:25:09 AM PST by
fiesti
To: fiesti
Judge Farnell issued a stay and then less than an hour later he reversed himself. So yes, the deposition should have happened as scheduled. I believe it was scheduled for last Friday. (or thursday, not sure, I'm losing track of the days!)
30 posted on
11/24/2003 6:33:10 AM PST by
wisconsinconservative
("The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.")
To: fiesti
The depo of the radiologist is a done deal.
If Greer had quashed the depo, it would have been done anyway. Maybe in a media forum. Who knows.
69 posted on
11/24/2003 5:00:16 PM PST by
KDubRN
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson