We need to email Greer and request that the Guardianship hearing move forward rapidly...that there is genuine suffering, needless suffering going on every second he delays.
The more this man hears about what American know about this case, perhaps the more motivated he will become to inform himself and to act accordingly.<p.Felos has Greer cowared, we need to awaken the conscience and spirit of our laws within Greer. Through prayer, emails, phone calls and anything we can think of to bring this Judge into the realm of the type of justice our constitution calls for...Felos has him running scared, it would appear, big time.
Greer better wake up and realize his rulings discriminate against disabled people. By ruling Terri is in a PVS state and she has a terminal condition (even though under FL law, PVS is distinct from a terminal illness) Greer is making discriminatory rulings, which if they are allowed to stand, will affect the health and well-being of other disabled people.
Judges have been removed for other kinds of discrimination, why are the disabled fair game? The Americans with Disabilities Act protects people such as Terri. For Greer to disallow her rights under the ADA because of her disability is wrong! Greer would be the first to cry about his rights being taken away if he was removed from the bench for being legally blind, wouldn't he?
Terri does not belong in a hospice - Felos had her put there to convey the impression she is terminally ill and close to a natural death. He is so wrong. Greer and the other Pinellas judge-puppets are not defending her right to lve! They err on the side of killing her, which is against the law, as cited by Connor in Bush's response of Nov. 19th.
If he cannot be sure what she wanted, he must err on the side of life. That's the law! There is no 'clear and convincing' evidence Terri ever said she PREFER to be starved and dehydrated to death if she ever became disabled!
Supercat, your example of a person saying "I wouldn't want to like like that" while passing a homeless person is perfect. No where in that statement of distaste for a situation is there any implication the speaker is saying they would rather be DEAD - "Please kill me if I ever become homeless" - no, this will never pass muster in front of a jury. MS is a fraud! His atty is fascinated with death and killing. They are both sick.