Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ServesURight
Problem isn't the brain, it's the body, especially in combat aircraft. The human body can take less of a beating than any component in a modern fighterplane, it can withstand fewer g-forces, fewer hours of high stress flight and needs to spend more time in recouperation. It also sits in the least armored part of the plane (thanks to people's need to see outside and the canopy that requires), takes up a huge amount of space and requires even more space to be take up in life sustaining equipment. If we leave the body (and the brain) on the ground we can make significantly more effective aircraft that will be able to out perform anything carrying a person.
43 posted on 11/23/2003 6:31:11 PM PST by discostu (You figure that's gotta be jelly cos jam just don't shake like that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: discostu
G capability is increasingly less important in designing a fighter. Dogfighting is largely a thing of the past - and new systems coming on line will increase that trend.

Hate to admit it.
70 posted on 11/23/2003 8:09:16 PM PST by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson