Skip to comments.
Army Seeks Short-Term Payoff From Future Combat Systems
National Defense Magazine ^
| December 2003
| Sandra I. Erwin
Posted on 11/23/2003 5:19:13 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-257 next last
To: FreedomPoster; archy
Maybe I have read so many archy posts I am beginning to sound like him.
Where is that old reprobate, anyway? Yo, archy, give the Russian hottie a break for a minute and come to the computer.
To: Tailback
Its the Radio Show not the TV.
222
posted on
01/01/2004 8:49:08 PM PST
by
Ranger
To: SJSAMPLE
O'Gara is the other half of the production along with American General if I'm correct. Civilian production isn't relevant unless modified to military spec unless they are substituted to allow military spec production to be exclusively sent to Iraq. Also I believe its a source of potential productive capacity that is currently untapped to meet a relatively straight forward production problem. 3500 vehicles isn't much to get out the door, but at current rates of betwen 80 and 220 per month its not enough and at that rate it seems likely that we will take 1000 for KIAs before the need is met. What a waste. We can do better.
223
posted on
01/01/2004 8:53:14 PM PST
by
Ranger
To: Ranger
Its the Radio Show not the TV.
Roger that.
To: ExSoldier
Re your #167:
A hearty "Amen" for your suggestion to return to the good old .45ACP.
Any "soldier" too effeminate or limp-wristed to handle a real fighting sidearm needs to be back in the rear echelon behind a desk or on bedpan detail in the Hospital.
The 9MM is a study in military political correctness, and I have little doubt that it has already cost us some lives.
Although I'm not a big GLOCK fan, the plastic pistol in .45 would be pretty soldier-proof and weather-resistant I would imagine. And they can cast them in OD, which I'm sure the Army would like.
As to your rifle suggestion; we are on the same page there as well.
Have you seen the RobArms M-96, based on the STONER system?
Looks like a winner to me.
And we hear tell that the Army is experimenting with a new 6.85 X 43MM round that is way superior to the current 5.56MM.
Stay tuned!
225
posted on
01/01/2004 10:18:21 PM PST
by
Uncle Jaque
("We need a Revival; Not a Revolution;... a Committment; Not a New Constitution..." -S. GREEN)
To: archy
Re your #133:
Very interesting post - thanks!
It's kind of a shame so many Iraqi tanks etc. got blown up, when we might be using a few of them to protect our troops over there.
Why can't the main gun of one of those Soviet-type tanks be replaced with a 7.62mm Mini-Gun for Convoy support missions?
Do they generate sufficient electrical current to run one?
And if wer'e going to be getting all these vehicles blowed up so frequently, at least it seems economical to use captured enemy vehicles to absorb the abuse rather than the ones us Taxpayers have to pay for.
When we turn the Country back over to the Iraqi authorities, they can have their toys back modified compliments of the good ol' USA, rather than having US foot the bill for brand new equipment.
Of course there is too much money to be made by politicians, beauraucrats and contractors alike to allow anything that makes too much sense to happen, isn't there?
BTW; In Nam, we were told once, they used to pack hot asphalt between the door panels and under the plywood floor boards of their vehicles, and apparently it didn't weigh much more than equivalent steel armor but was quite effective. I wonder if someone over there could test this theory on some junked vehicles just for hoots & hollers.
226
posted on
01/01/2004 10:55:01 PM PST
by
Uncle Jaque
("We need a Revival; Not a Revolution;... a Committment; Not a New Constitution..." -S. GREEN)
To: All
227
posted on
01/02/2004 1:05:05 AM PST
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(To close with and destroy the enemy by firepower, manuever, and shock)
To: FreedomPoster
"Ever seen the muzzle flash from a cut-down FAL carbine, with 7.62x51?I'm pretty sure that muzzle flash is produced by ammunition and not barrell length. So if it means that powder type or amounts have to be modified, so be it. If there are a lot of folks shooting, even with the 5.56mm then there is still going to be muzzle signature. In fact, on my M1 Abrams tank, it didn't matter if there was no shooting being done, because my thermal sight detected body heat, recently warm engines, you name it. I think in future war, muzzle flash is going to be a non-issue. Forget my tank for a moment, and the infantry weapons like the TOW anti-tank missiles that have thermals, but in straight on infantry fighting, it won't matter if there's a lot of muzzle flash because, to put it in terms of my old southern platoon sergeant: "Them that gets hot heavy lead in the air the quickest and most accurate is goin' to be whut is the winner." Do you see my point, here? Volume of accurate fire keeps heads down. It doesn't matter if that fire is bright or dim. If your head is in the dirt to keep it from gettin' blown off, the other elements can then manuever and finish the job. The four "F" principle in action: "Find 'em, Fix 'em FIGHT 'em and Finish 'em!"
228
posted on
01/02/2004 5:16:26 AM PST
by
ExSoldier
(When the going gets tough, the tough go cyclic.)
To: ExSoldier
>>I'm pretty sure that muzzle flash is produced by ammunition and not barrell length.
It's a combination of the two, in this case. All the powder isn't burnt yet, in a shorty barrel. And while you could adjust the powder, then you lose the ammunition commonality with the M240s and such.
I'm all for an alternative to the 5.56x45, was just pointing out an issue with the 7.62x51 carbine scenario. There's probably a 6mm or 6.5mm assault rifle waiting to be developed. And I still think OICW is a joke.
I really think where the Stryker platoons are headed is the right idea, where you've got a scoped 7.62x51-equipped guy at the squad level as a designated marksmen, plus a mix of SAWs, 203s, and M4s. If we need two/squad, that'll happen in the field, and then hopefully it'll get changed on the official TO&E. Gets away from the "one size fits all" idea, which was pretty much the concept back when the M-16 was introduced.
229
posted on
01/02/2004 5:37:45 AM PST
by
FreedomPoster
(this space intentionally blank)
To: Uncle Jaque
If there was but one sidearm I could carry into a combat zone, I'd have to choose a M30 Glock in 45ACP. Talk about sturdy and unjammable! Still, to it's credit, it's dishwasher safe! LOL I just sold my M30 to my nephew so I can buy a smaller 45 for a carry gun: A ParaOrdnance "Para Carry" or the C6 as it is known to the company.
The idea that the 9mm is somehow easier to shoot is laughable. First of all the Beretta M9 has a really l-o-o-o-o-n-g trigger pull, and lots of smaller fisted ladies and gents have a hard time making the first shot double action. Then the round itself is undersized and underpowered, especially when an FMJ rd rather than a JHP or frangible rd is used. I know all that BS about it being the one with the longest record of killing folks. But the fact remains it was designed for the first submachineguns and yes, when your target takes a fifteen rd burst, he's history. But for the proverbial "one shot stop" nothing beats the cross sectional density of the venerable 45ACP.
230
posted on
01/02/2004 6:23:20 AM PST
by
ExSoldier
(When the going gets tough, the tough go cyclic.)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Maybe I have read so many archy posts I am beginning to sound like him. Where is that old reprobate, anyway? Yo, archy, give the Russian hottie a break for a minute and come to the computer.
She got her deer, and she's back to work. And I'm back around, and catching up on old posts and pings- like this one.
FYI, of late, I've been paying attention tothe recent *light truck* purchase the Army's getting ready to make, which i hope is a little more than just a replay of the old CUCV and Dodge M880 pickup commercial truck buy.
I guess the armorable Humvees were thougfht to be too much of a threat to the Strykers....
-archy-/-
231
posted on
01/05/2004 11:27:42 AM PST
by
archy
(Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
To: ExSoldier
LOL My buddy was telling me that during first Gulf War, back in '91, when his SpecOps unit hit the desert the first thing they did was go over and buy about 70 Range Rovers and Toyota Land Cruisers for the SOF guys to do recons. That's part of the story. The other half is that a Land Rover will fit the drive-in ramp of a CH47 Chinook helicopter, a HUMVEE is too wide to be carried aboard. For the same reason, the Army's Ranger battallions are going to the Landy as well.
Should American forces come to a bridgeless river, they come to a screeching halt. The Rangers, at least, may be able to get across with their vehicles; if regular Infantry units cross via Helo inserts, they do so as leg infantry without their vehicles.
And as for being accompanied by Strykers, forget it. They won't even fit in a C130, and only mount a .50 Browning MG.
232
posted on
03/14/2004 1:18:20 PM PST
by
archy
(Concrete shoes, cyanide, TNT! Done dirt cheap! Neckties, contracts, high voltage...Done dirt cheap!)
To: archy
The "LOG" side wasn't mentioned, although it makes perfect sense. Maybe since he knew I used to be a Log puke myself at the G-Staff level, he figured I already knew.... It was the fact that a Humvee is recognizable as purely AMERICAN and therefore becomes an "RPG" magnet, whereas a Land Rover or Cruiser might be a wandering sheik.
It was just the way he told it, with a bunch of SOF guys all loaded up fer bear hauling A$$ across the sands in this luxury vehicle, AC and stereo blasting.....well it made a funny mental image.
233
posted on
03/14/2004 1:25:31 PM PST
by
ExSoldier
(When the going gets tough, the tough go cyclic.)
To: Trust but Verify
My nephew is leaving on Jan 14th for Ft Benning and basic training. My sister is having a farewell party for him and I have no idea what kind of a gift to bring for him. First of all, I don't know what kind of personal items recruits are allowed to have with them, secondly, what might he have use for during those weeks? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
First off: Never mind what he might take with him. Send him a reoccuring package every week, to include a couple of prestamped envelopes so that he can write who he chooses- but include at least one preaddressed to you so that HE can tell you what to continue sending, what to discontinue, and any useful additions and/or changes.
The US Postal Priority cardboard mailers, about a foot wide and a bit longer by about an inch and a half thick offer a good starting place, and the mailer and stamp will cost $3.80 no matter how much the contents you include weigh. I'd include hard candy such as lemon drops and grape, lemon, orange or lemon-lime kool aid, which helps kill the taste of field purified water, and if you can find whatever magazines he favors, that can be a worthwhile addition after about the first half of his training cycle, when things have settled down a bit. One strong suggestion: if you can be there for his unit's OSUT graduation do so. It's an experience he'll not forget.
-archy-/-
234
posted on
03/14/2004 1:30:28 PM PST
by
archy
(Concrete shoes, cyanide, TNT! Done dirt cheap! Neckties, contracts, high voltage...Done dirt cheap!)
To: FreedomPoster
Ever seen the muzzle flash from a cut-down FAL carbine, with 7.62x51? It is quite impressive. Like the muzzle flash at night from a shotgun loaded with a magnum buckshot load, that nighttime flash, blast and boom is the universal symbol in all languages for *Throw Grenade Here.*
235
posted on
03/14/2004 1:36:10 PM PST
by
archy
(Concrete shoes, cyanide, TNT! Done dirt cheap! Neckties, contracts, high voltage...Done dirt cheap!)
To: ExSoldier
It was just the way he told it, with a bunch of SOF guys all loaded up fer bear hauling A$$ across the sands in this luxury vehicle, AC and stereo blasting.....well it made a funny mental image. Most of the Range Rover and Discovery vehicles used by the Brits are painted not camo, but UN IFOR white for pretty much the same reason; at night, at least, they can slip by and pass for civvie vehicles, unlikely for a HUMVEE or a Land Rover Wolf with the MGs fitted.
But the troopies of the 14th Intel Coy, inheritors of the traditions and honours of the British Eighth Army's jeep-mounted *Popski's Private Army* as well as a few of the techniques get along in their *civvy-street* vehicles quite nicely, including motorbikes. It's also rumored that they also have a couple of Rolls-Royces at their disposal.
236
posted on
03/14/2004 1:48:18 PM PST
by
archy
(Concrete shoes, cyanide, TNT! Done dirt cheap! Neckties, contracts, high voltage...Done dirt cheap!)
To: archy
We are going to Benning for the graduation! We leave on the 23rd, he graduates on the 25th. I'm sooo proud of him!He is doing very, very well. He made top marksman in his company, and tops in grenade throwing! I told him he was going to be drafted into the infantry with scores like that, but he said he was disqualified from infantry for his eyesight!
Right after graduation, he reports to Fort Gordon for his MOS training. That post seems to be the HQ for the Army Signal Corps. He is a 'computer nerd' who scored 94 on his ASVAB and they really want him to sit at a desk.
237
posted on
03/14/2004 2:20:58 PM PST
by
Trust but Verify
(Charter member Broken Glass Republicans (2000))
To: Trust but Verify
We are going to Benning for the graduation! We leave on the 23rd, he graduates on the 25th. I'm sooo proud of him!He is doing very, very well. He made top marksman in his company, and tops in grenade throwing! I told him he was going to be drafted into the infantry with scores like that, but he said he was disqualified from infantry for his eyesight! Right after graduation, he reports to Fort Gordon for his MOS training. That post seems to be the HQ for the Army Signal Corps. He is a 'computer nerd' who scored 94 on his ASVAB and they really want him to sit at a desk. Ft Gordon info *here*. That's a whale of an opportunity for him to look at the possibilities of advanced Signal Corps branch training, with either OCS or a Army-paid college ROTC program leading to the butterbars of a 2nd lieutenant and the crossed flags of the signal corps branch.
Keep in touch with me about this possibility, and if he does happen to have in interest in such a career direction, let me know.
-archy-/-
238
posted on
03/14/2004 3:23:23 PM PST
by
archy
(Concrete shoes, cyanide, TNT! Done dirt cheap! Neckties, contracts, high voltage...Done dirt cheap!)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
can you try again with the pics?
239
posted on
03/14/2004 6:35:23 PM PST
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: Destro
Rhodesian Pookie
Rhodesian Leopard
Rhodesian Cougar
Rhodesian Rhino
Kudu
South African Casspir
240
posted on
03/16/2004 10:59:03 PM PST
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I always thought the Yankees had something to do with it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-257 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson