Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's Not Only About Terri Schiavo
The Village Voice ^ | November 21, 2003 | Nat Hentoff

Posted on 11/22/2003 11:44:49 AM PST by sweetliberty

People already have the right to refuse unwanted treatment, and suicide is not illegal. What we oppose is a public policy that singles out individuals for legalized killing based on their health status. This violates the Americans With Disabilities Act, and denies us equal protection of the laws.

Disability opposition to this ultimate form of discrimination has been ignored by most media and courts, but countless people with disabilities have already died before their time. —Not Dead Yet: The Resistance, a disability rights organization, Forest Park, Illinois, October 28, 2003


In 1920, a prominent German lawyer, Karl Binding, and a distinguished German forensic psychiatrist, Alfred Hoche, wrote a brief but deadly book, The Permission To Destroy Life Unworthy of Life. In his new book, The Coming of the Third Reich (Penguin), Richard Evans notes that Binding and Hoche emphasized that "the incurably ill and the mentally retarded were costing millions of marks and taking up thousands of much-needed hospital beds. So doctors should be allowed to put them to death."

Then came Adolf Hitler, who thought this was a splendid, indeed capital, idea. The October 1, 2003, New York Daily News ran this Associated Press report from Berlin:

"A new study reveals Nazi Germany killed at least 200,000 people because of their disabilities—people deemed physically inferior, said a report compiled by Germany's Federal Archive. Researchers found evidence that doctors and hospital staff used gas, drugs and starvation to kill disabled men, women and children at medical facilities in Germany, Austria, Poland and the Czech Republic. . . .

"The Nazis launched the drive to root out what they called 'worthless lives' [and 'useless eaters'] in the summer of 1939, pre-dating their full-scale organization of the Holocaust, in which they killed 6 million Jews." (Emphasis added).

The more than 200,000 "worthless lives" terminated by the Nazis before the Holocaust included few Jews. Most of those killed were other Germans considered unfit to be included in "the master race."

Among the defendants at the Nuremberg trials of Nazi leaders and their primary accomplices in the mass murder were German doctors who had gone along with the official policy of euthanasia. An American doctor, Leo Alexander, who spoke German, had interviewed the German physician-defendants before the trials, and then served as an expert on the American staff at Nuremberg.

In an article in the July 14, 1949, New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Alexander warned that the Nazis' crimes against humanity had "started from small beginnings . . . merely a subtle shift in emphasis in the basic attitude of the physicians. It started with the acceptance, basic in the euthanasia movement, that there is such a thing as life not worthy to be lived." That shift in emphasis among physicians, said Dr. Alexander, could happen here, in America.

Actually, the devaluing of apparent "imperfect life" had begun years before, in the United States. Various academics, in and out of the medical profession, had successfully advocated and instituted a eugenics movement—the perfecting of future generations of Americans by deciding who, depending on their hereditary genes, would be allowed to have children. The unfit would no longer be permitted to reproduce.

These American eugenicists provided German proponents of a "master race" with inspiration. As Robert Jay Lifton wrote in his invaluable book The Nazi Doctors (Basic Books), "A rising interest in eugenics [in America had] led, by 1920, to the enactment of laws in twenty-five states providing for compulsory sterilization of the criminally insane and other people considered genetically inferior." (Emphasis added).

Paying attention in Germany, Heinrich Himmler, one of Hitler's executioners, said the Nazis were "like the plant-breeding specialist who, when he wants to breed a pure new strain . . . goes over the field to cull the unwanted plants." Under the Nazis, there were eugenics courts to decide who could have children. In the United States Supreme Court (Buck v. Bell, 1927), Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, ruling that 18-year-old Carrie Buck should be involuntarily sterilized, famously wrote:

"If instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing of their kind. . . . Three generations of imbeciles are enough." Only Justice Pierce Butler dissented.

In this country, the eugenics movement lost its cachet for a time because the Nazis had gone from sterilization of the disabled to herding the religiously, racially, and politically unfit into gas chambers.

But there has been an American revival of eugenics in certain elite circles. A few years ago, an archconservative who had talked with some of the present-day, would-be purifiers of the American stock told me they were delighted at the deaths from AIDS of homosexuals.

But to protect the disabled from "mercy" killings, as well as eugenicists, another movement was forming here. Not long before he died, Dr. Alexander read an article in the April 12, 1984, New England Journal of Medicine by 10 physicians—part of the growing "death with dignity" brigade. They were from such prestigious medical schools as Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and the University of Virginia. These distinguished healers wrote that when a patient was in a "persistent vegetative state," it was "morally justifiable" to "withhold antibiotics and artificial nutrition (feeding tubes) and hydration, as well as other forms of life-sustaining treatment, allowing the patient to die." They ignored the finding that not all persistent vegetative states are permanent.

After reading the article, Dr. Alexander said to a friend: "It is much like Germany in the '20s and '30s. The barriers against killing are coming down."

Next week: The growing conviction among American doctors, bioethicists, and hospital ethics committees that it is "futile" to try to treat certain patients, and therefore, medical professionals should have the power to decide—even against the wishes of the family—when to allow these valueless lives to end.

If the courts finally permit the husband of brain-damaged Terri Schiavo to continue to press for her death by starvation—by again removing her feeding tube—more of the barriers to killing may come down in other states. So this isn't only about Terri Schiavo. It could be about you


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: geotgefelos; governorjebbush; hino; judgebaird; judgegreer; michaelschiavo; reallifeghouls; schiavo; terrischiavo; terrislaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 11/22/2003 11:44:50 AM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
But there has been an American revival of eugenics in certain elite circles. A few years ago, an archconservative who had talked with some of the present-day, would-be purifiers of the American stock told me they were delighted at the deaths from AIDS of homosexuals.

He couldn't resist throwing this in. Talk about apples and oranges.

2 posted on 11/22/2003 11:50:23 AM PST by Randjuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Budge; Pegita; cyn; Ladysmith; Calpernia; Babalu; floriduh voter; dandelion; PleaseNoMore; ...
Terri's Army ping!

If you want on or off of this ping list, please let me know.

3 posted on 11/22/2003 11:51:57 AM PST by sweetliberty ("Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
bump
4 posted on 11/22/2003 11:53:44 AM PST by NonValueAdded ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." GWB 9/20/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Randjuke
actually, the more relevant issue regarding homosexuality is whether scientists ever find a gene marker that would, in utero, predict that a baby would be gay. the gay movement is very fearful of this possibility, because they fear that prospective parents would abort all babies that might be gay.
if this ever happens, the gays may end up on the right to life side of the debate.
5 posted on 11/22/2003 11:58:50 AM PST by drhogan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Randjuke
"Three generations of imbeciles are enough"

It was obviously a failure. We still have people who vote for democRATs.

6 posted on 11/22/2003 12:01:25 PM PST by sweetliberty ("Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
Dr. Alexander warned that the Nazis' crimes against humanity had "started from small beginnings . . . merely a subtle shift in emphasis in the basic attitude of the physicians. It started with the acceptance, basic in the euthanasia movement, that there is such a thing as life not worthy to be lived." That shift in emphasis among physicians, said Dr. Alexander, could happen here, in America.

It has happened here.

The root of this evil is a shallow, materialistic view of human life. If a person can't work and earn money, can't enjoy sex or varied food, can't even watch TV, looks funny or takes other peoples' time, there is no value to such a life.

The only real argument to defeat this is to understand that life comes from God, every life is precious to Him, and therefore worthy of our respect and protection.

7 posted on 11/22/2003 12:08:09 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
"So this isn't only about Terri Schiavo. It could be about you."

True. Nat Hentoff is excellent here, as usual. Agree or disagree with him (I do both, regularly) you will always come away feeling you learned something.

I have thought for a long time that the right to life movement should adopt the slogan "Abortion Kills...People Like YOU".



8 posted on 11/22/2003 12:13:42 PM PST by jocon307 (Ack! and Double Ack!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

+ "In His hand is the life of every living thing, and the breath of all mankind." Job 12:10
9 posted on 11/22/2003 12:14:46 PM PST by Pegita ('Tis so sweet to trust in Jesus, just to take Him at His Word ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
I will second that statement and just add one more. If and when this movement gains any serious credibility, it will be the LAST straw before JUDGMENT befalls America and any other nation that practices the same. It reminds me of the scripture "being WISE in THEIR OWN EYES, they became FOOLS"!!
10 posted on 11/22/2003 12:28:11 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
Yes!! I have a button that I wore for a long time. It reads: I'm so glad my mother didn't murder me"!! THAT little button caught the eye of a bank teller one day and caused her to practically lose it. Talk about pushing buttons!! LOL
11 posted on 11/22/2003 12:30:43 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
"The only real argument to defeat this is to understand that life comes from God, every life is precious to Him, and therefore worthy of our respect and protection."

And isn't this the essence of the conflict? Those that lead the death parade are either the godless liberal/atheist/Nazi/commies OR they may profess a belief in God while denying His power and being void of reverence for Him. In fact, the scriptures speak very plainly of such people and we see them everywhere, but where they are truly dangerous are in positions of power over others. In this case, it is especially true of doctors and judges and administrators in various capacities, not to mention of a man who is abusing his "privilege" as a husband and guardian, all who have a vested interest in seeing this woman dead.

"This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. (2 Tim.3:1-7)

12 posted on 11/22/2003 12:33:54 PM PST by sweetliberty ("Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
See my last post.
13 posted on 11/22/2003 12:34:44 PM PST by sweetliberty ("Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
When I think deeply about these matters I can hardly sleep. Your posts are always spot on, sweet liberty.
14 posted on 11/22/2003 12:37:16 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
Thanks for posting. Wish we could wake up the Catholics to this one.
15 posted on 11/22/2003 12:38:32 PM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
> A few years ago, an archconservative who had talked with some of the present-day, would-be purifiers of the American stock told me they were delighted at the deaths from AIDS of homosexuals.

Give the names, please. This is not a conservative position and never has been. Eugenics has always been on the anti-religious, social Darwinist, left side of the spectrum.

T'wit's Fifth Law again. "Liberals are incapable of admitting a truth about themselves without telling a corresponding lie about conservatives -- for balance."

16 posted on 11/22/2003 12:45:27 PM PST by T'wit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
"Wish we could wake up the Catholics to this one."

Read The Catholic Standard & Times.
Every week they have articles about Terri and her plight.

17 posted on 11/22/2003 12:50:10 PM PST by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: T'wit
"A few years ago, an archconservative who had talked with some of the present-day, would-be purifiers of the American stock told me they were delighted at the deaths from AIDS of homosexuals."

I'm not sure it is the archconservative who is being critized here. I'm not sure it is archconservatives who are the "would-be purifiers", it could be, but it isn't clear that that is what is being stated.
18 posted on 11/22/2003 12:58:58 PM PST by jocon307 (Ack! and Double Ack!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded; nicmarlo; FatherOfLiberty; lonevoice; Republic; ChemistCat; KDubRN; pc93; ...
Did we ever figure out the status of the admission of the deposition of the doctor who did the bone scan? I got an email today that made it sound like it's in. I am still confused on that. I took a break yesterday so I'm a little behind.

Here is the content of that portion of the email (but I think it refers back to the article that caused so much confusion in the first place):

.

Judge Denies Michael's Bid to Block New Info on Potential Abuse of Terri Schiavo
Without a hearing, Judge Farnell first agreed with Michael's request to block the discovery of new information regarding Terri's bone scan. Less than an hour later, he conducted an emergency hearing and reversed his order! You can read all about it by clicking on the title.

19 posted on 11/22/2003 1:01:50 PM PST by sweetliberty ("Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Randjuke
Actually, the bit about homosexuals is pretty clever. Most readers of The Village Voice are liberals, and many are homosexuals. This will serve to remind them that political correctness can strike back at them.

After all, from a Darwinian point of view, homosexuals are the quintessential "useless eaters," because they don't breed.

Liberals should be reminded that what they are doing will eventually strike back at them.
20 posted on 11/22/2003 1:15:40 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson