Skip to comments.
Lulac Frowns at Texas Redistricting
San Antonio Express News ^
| November 22, 2003
Posted on 11/22/2003 8:11:01 AM PST by wildbill
LULAC frowns at Texas remap
By Gary Martin Express-News Washington Bureau
Web Posted : 11/22/2003 12:00 AM
WASHINGTON A Hispanic civil rights group told the Justice Department on Friday that a newly adopted redistricting plan in Texas would dilute minority strength at the ballot box and violate the voting rights of Hispanics. The League of United Latin American Citizens said the plan decreases the number of minority-majority congressional districts from 12 to nine.
LULAC said minorities have lost their majority status in three congressional districts in Dallas, Austin and the San Antonio-based 23rd which sweeps from Laredo to El Paso.
"Our position is that we are clearly worse off because we lost three congressional districts," said Rolando Rios of San Antonio, one of four LULAC attorneys who participated in the Justice Department hearing.
LULAC is asking the Justice Department to find the Texas redistricting plan violates the Voting Rights Act.
Minority rights groups have filed lawsuits challenging the plan, adopted by the Legislature this year and signed into law by Gov. Rick Perry.
The Republican-drawn plan would increase the number of likely GOP congressional seats, but would divide Hispanic populations, LULAC and other minority rights groups say.
The Texas attorney general's office said it expects the redistricting plan to be upheld by a federal three-judge panel, which is to hear arguments Dec. 11.
Democrats in East Texas filed a lawsuit challenging the redistricting plan, saying the newly drawn lines would disenfranchise African-American voters.
The American GI Forum and the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund also have challenged the GOP map, which claims to create new minority districts.
In the 23rd congressional district, the percentage of registered voters with Hispanic surnames would decrease from 56 percent to 44 percent, Rios said.
Rep. Henry Bonilla, R-San Antonio, narrowly won re-election in 2000 to the 23rd congressional seat, defeating Democrat Henry Cuellar by about 6,500 votes.
The redrawn district includes more conservative voters in Kerr and Bandera counties.
TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; immigrantlist; redistricting; texas; votingrightsact
The GOP claimed this plan would provide additional minority seats. Looks like a court challenge for sure.
1
posted on
11/22/2003 8:11:01 AM PST
by
wildbill
To: 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 4.1O dana super trac pak; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; A CA Guy; ...
LULAC claims..."minorities have lost their majority status."
Huh? Could you run that by me in real English, please?
2
posted on
11/22/2003 8:25:37 AM PST
by
HiJinx
(Go with Courage, go with Honor, go in God's Grace. Come home when the job's done. We'll be here.)
To: HiJinx
Yeah that does seem a contradictory statement.
3
posted on
11/22/2003 8:28:21 AM PST
by
Klickitat
To: wildbill
The GOP claimed this plan would provide additional minority seats.It will.
4
posted on
11/22/2003 8:28:36 AM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: HiJinx
A Hispanic civil rights group told the Justice Department on Friday that a newly adopted redistricting plan in Texas would dilute minority strength at the ballot box and violate the voting rights of Hispanics. Sounds like they want the "right" to have their minority vote override that of the majority.
5
posted on
11/22/2003 8:31:39 AM PST
by
SCalGal
To: HiJinx
If they don't like it ... screw 'em. Minority does not dictate to the majority. This is the case even if you are Mexican or Black or just a pissed off 'cRAT.
6
posted on
11/22/2003 8:34:28 AM PST
by
dennisw
(G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
To: wildbill
"Our position is that we are clearly worse off because we lost three congressional districts," said Rolando Rios of San AntonioThey really do see this as a fight over the USA --- they believe they own certain districts. Balkinization is real.
7
posted on
11/22/2003 8:35:39 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: HiJinx
It means that in some districts, hispanics are no longer the largest ethnic group.
Specifically, they're complaining about Martin Frost's district, and Henry Bonilla's.
In Frost's case, they're complaining that they won't be able to elect the white guy. Go figure.
8
posted on
11/22/2003 8:37:30 AM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
LULAC=COMMUNISTS
9
posted on
11/22/2003 8:39:15 AM PST
by
Rome2000
(McCarthy was right!)
To: dennisw
If they don't like it, they could go back to Mexico where they are the clear "majority". They don't have to put up with Americans at all there.
10
posted on
11/22/2003 8:43:12 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: dennisw
Well said!
11
posted on
11/22/2003 8:47:55 AM PST
by
Arpege92
To: wildbill
LULAC frowns [and Atlas Shrugged]
Hey, LULAC -- just turn that frown :( upside down and then you'll be all smiles :) :) :) again.
To: wildbill
I thought the Constitution was about "INDIVIDUAL" liberty. What difference does it make how many "LatEEEEnos live in a given area, especially when at least one quarter of them are there illegally and have nor right to vote in the first place?
To: HiJinx
14
posted on
11/22/2003 9:20:25 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(http://richard.meek.home.comcast.net/SorosClintoon.JPG)
To: HiJinx
That means they are being the house toaddies for the RATs. They have to have the RIGHT Kind of Districts to put the RIGHT kind CongressRATS in Washington and the State Legislature. (Note: Read Right as DemoRAT Leftist, Voz La Raza SCUM)
15
posted on
11/22/2003 11:16:18 AM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Klickitat
Lulac never was that smart anyway. They should be caled LoonieLac.
16
posted on
11/22/2003 11:17:59 AM PST
by
unixfox
(Close the borders, problems solved!)
To: FITZ
The Voting Rights Act was orginially passed to stop the KKK from chasing black voters from the polls on election day. Since then, the Act was intrepreted to include minority-majority voting districts. Now the Voting Rights Act is being intrepreted to mean RATS have the right to be in the majority.
17
posted on
11/22/2003 11:27:20 AM PST
by
Kuksool
(Deported Illegals = GOP Election Victories)
To: wildbill
The GOP claimed this plan would provide additional minority seats. Looks like a court challenge for sure. There's no way to tell until after an election.
18
posted on
11/22/2003 12:01:28 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: wildbill
Lulac Frowns at Texas RedistrictingIt makes me happy whenever LULAC is unhappy.
19
posted on
11/22/2003 2:01:10 PM PST
by
usadave
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson