Better that an innocent guy, facing a false rape charge have to face a life in prison, than that dozens of rapists be enabled to explore the relevance of previous sexual activity of their accuser. Funny, how different it can sound without the spin The rape shield law is operating properly in this case. There is no discussion in court of how many partners she has had, etc. There is a limited discussion about who she may have had sex with immediately before and after the alleged rape.
|
The name thing? Geez, the Judge and the Prosecution did not even seek sanctions or anything. It was a minor deal. Is that all that has you in a twist?
Honestly, what defense question(s) did you find slimey?