Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carolinamom
Since Kobey has already admitted to sexual intercourse w/the accuser (no semen, however),

The vaginal swabs have not been tested, and even though he did not ejaculate, it is still possible it is his. I agree, if it's not I don't see how the threshold of "beyond a reasonable doubt" could be met.

With the other evidence in her panties and the microscopic amount of blood on his shirt

The blood streaks on his shirt were not microscopic. Transcript links are available on the thread.

406 posted on 11/21/2003 5:16:08 PM PST by cyncooper ("The evil is in plain sight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
The vagina tears could only be seen under the microscope after being stained. How much blood could come from this kind of tear?
410 posted on 11/21/2003 5:40:32 PM PST by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies ]

To: cyncooper
The blood streaks on his shirt were not microscopic.

Then why didn't the detective say he saw them with his naked eye???

Did you read the cross? Notice he insinuated he SAW the blood until Mackey asked him about it?

449 posted on 11/21/2003 6:44:32 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson