To: cyncooper
The vagina tears could only be seen under the microscope after being stained. How much blood could come from this kind of tear?
To: Carolinamom
That isn't the testimony, either--that they were only visible with dye via microscope. There were two photos introduced, one with dye and one without. The dye and magification were to enhance the ability to see, but they were not invisible.
I am guessing the prosecution will try to show that the two 1 centimeter (not tiny, imo) and "too many to count" 1 mm tears were the source.
That has not been the specific testimony, and I'm not arguing it definitely was. Just perceiving that's where they're headed.
411 posted on
11/21/2003 5:45:54 PM PST by
cyncooper
("The evil is in plain sight")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson