Okay, one last time, just to make sure I understand your position...
If Kobe Bryant had indisputable proof that his accuser had sex with a horse that morning, you would not only exclude that evidence as irrelevant, but think that's only fair, correct?
"If Kobe Bryant had indisputable proof that his accuser had sex with a horse that morning, you would not only exclude that evidence as irrelevant, but think that's only fair, correct?"
Does he? I doubt he does.