Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the 'Cat in the Hat' subversive?
National Review ^ | 11/21/03 | John Miller

Posted on 11/21/2003 10:07:17 AM PST by KantianBurke

Hey moms and dads: Bet you don't know what Dr. Seuss really thought about his most famous book, The Cat in the Hat — the basis for this weekend's big movie opening. "I'm subversive as hell," Seuss once said. "The Cat in the Hat is a revolt against authority. ... It's revolutionary in that it goes as far as Kerensky, and then stops. It doesn't go quite as far as Lenin."

Russian-history refresher: Alexander Kerensky was an ineffective revolutionary dictator who preceded Lenin. He wasn't a Commie, but he was a man of the far Left — and not exactly a champion of freedom.

Happily, America's most celebrated children's author was exaggerating. The only thing that's even arguably "subversive" about The Cat in the Hat appears on its final two pages, following the raucous performance of the book's title character, who has just cleaned up an extravagant mess and taken his leave.

Then our mother came in And she said to us two, "Did you have any fun? Tell me. What did you do?"

And Sally and I did not know What to say. Should we tell her The things that went on there that day?

Perhaps keeping parents in the dark really is "a revolt against authority," as Seuss claims. It probably depends on what children are hiding. I've always chosen to read those lines — dozens of times to my own kids, by the way — as suggesting a child doesn't need to share every detail of his imagination with grown-ups. I'm perfectly comfortable with that, and any reasonable parent would be.

Yet Dr. Seuss — the pen name of Theodore Seuss Geisel, a non-doctor who died in 1991 — had politics in his bones. He came from a family of Republicans, but turned into an FDR Democrat in the 1930s and never looked back. He infused his books with liberal messages on everything from environmentalism to arms control, especially during the last quarter century of his life — though one of his lesser-known books is also deeply conservative and deserving of a revival.

Seuss's first public foray into politics came as a cartoonist for PM, a left-wing daily newspaper in New York, during the Second World War. He savaged all the right people: Hitler, Mussolini, and Hirohito. His caricatures of Hirohito — slit-eyed and buck-toothed — probably would be called racist today by the grievance industry; they are certainly forceful. More than 200 of his cartoons from this era were published several years ago in a collection called Dr. Seuss Goes to War. All of them are recognizably Seussian — the "art" in his children's books are really just zany cartoons — and many of them have a kind of relevance today. My favorite ran a few months before Pearl Harbor. A bright-eyed nincompoop labeled "The Appeaser" stands on a rock holding four lollypops. Sea monsters wearing swastika tattoos surround him. "Remember," says the man with a dumb smile, "One More Lollypop, and Then You All Go Home!" The picture is rooted in its time, but remains pertinent today because the problem of appeasement is ever with us.

Seuss held a special animus for the America First crowd of antiwar isolationists, and especially for Charles Lindbergh. He once drew a "Lindbergh Quarter" — it's an ostrich jabbing its head in the sand. He also wrote a bit of verse, which was not published but appears in a 1995 biography, Dr. Seuss and Mr. Geisel, by Judith and Neil Morgan:

The Lone Eagle had flown The Atlantic alone With fortitude and a ham sandwich. Great courage that took. But he shivered and shook At the sound of the gruff German landgwich. If this is liberalism, it's a liberalism many of us modern-day conservatives can embrace. The same goes for a few of Seuss's better-known children's books. Yertle the Turtle (1958) is an anti-authoritarian parable. Its final lines apply as much to Saddam Hussein as they once did to the European fascists: And today the great Yertle, that Marvelous he, Is King of the Mud. That is all he can see. And the turtles, of course ... all turtles are free As turtles and, maybe, all creatures should be. Another book, The Sneetches and Other Stories (1961), contains four tales. Each one is a plea for racial tolerance, continuing a theme Seuss explored during the war with cartoons urging full use of "colored labor" and railing against anti-Semitism. The stories are also amusing, with their meaning embedded inside a delightfully breezy anapestic tetrameter verse (two unstressed syllables followed by a stressed one, with four beats to the line) that Seuss employed to such wonderful effect throughout his career.

But that is not all. Oh no, that is not all (as the Cat in the Hat might say).

Over time, Seuss's stories became more strident. One of his most famous books, The Lorax (1971), remains a favorite of liberal environmentalists. In the tale, the Lorax, who "speaks for the trees," delivers a stern lecture to the Once-ler, a greedy industrialist:

Your machinery chugs on, day and night without stop making Gluppity-Glupp. Also Schloppity-Schlopp. And what do you do with this leftover goo? I'll show you. You dirty old Once-ler man you! You're glumping the pond where the Humming-fish hummed! No more can they hum, for their gills are all gummed. And so on. Now, I happen to love these lines — "Schloppity-Schlopp" is a bit of doggerel genius. At bottom, however, the book is a not-so-subtle attack on capitalism. (Go here to learn from Seuss's publisher how you can "Celebrate Earth Day with the Lorax.")

The next year, Seuss published Marvin K. Mooney Will You Please Go Now! Like The Cat in the Hat, it's an early-reader book meant for kids who are just getting started:

The time has come. The time is now. Just go. Go. GO! I don't care how. ... Marvin K. Mooney, I don't care how. Marvin K. Mooney, will you please GO NOW! Here's how the Morgans describe the book's political legacy in their biography: "In the spring of 1974, as the Watergate scandal neared its climax, Ted met the satirist Art Buchwald at the San Diego Zoo, and they became mutually admiring friends." Soon after, Buchwald dared Seuss to write a political book. Eager to comply, Seuss "grabbed a copy of Marvin K. Mooney and, with a few strokes of a pen, deleted each mention of that name and substituted the name of the president." On July 30, Buchwald's syndicated column was based on Seuss's revisions: "Richard M. Nixon, will you please go now!" Nine days later, Nixon really did go — he resigned — and Seuss was delighted. "We should have collaborated sooner," he wrote to Buchwald.

His most political book of all, however, was yet to come. Again, let's let the Morgans set the scene: "[Seuss] was brooding over the mounting cold war with the Soviet Union and believed that under Ronald Reagan the nuclear arms race was beyond control. Over dinner at La Valencia, he wondered out loud how a democratic government could impose 'such deadly stupidity' on people like him who were so opposed to nuclear proliferation." Then he wrote The Butter Battle Book (1984), which his publicists earnestly declared to be "probably the most important book Dr. Seuss has ever created." Seuss himself called it "the best book I've ever written."

The story describes a conflict between the blue-suited Yooks, who prefer to eat their bread with the "butter side up," and orange-suited Zooks, who eat their bread with the "butter side down." The Yooks and Zooks then embark on a perilous arms race. They build ever more menacing weapons, from the Triple-Sling Jigger to the Eight-Nozzled, Elephant-Toted Boom-Blitz, and finally the Bitsy Big-Boy Boomeroo, which is basically a pea-sized weapon of mass destruction. At the ambiguous conclusion, which recalls "The Lady or the Tiger," both the Yooks and Zooks have the boomeroo and look ready to use it.

All of Seuss's other books, including The Lorax, end on a hopeful note. The Butter Battle Book, alone, does not. It is also a perfect emblem of the moral equivalence that neutered so many liberals during the Cold War: It assumes that the half-century conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union was based on nothing more meaningful than a dispute over how people prefer to butter their bread — as if Communism weren't a threat to liberty, but an eating preference.

(Seuss did meet Reagan once, when he and his wife were guests at a state dinner. The story, as related by the Morgans, is wonderful because it is vintage Reagan: "[Seuss] was recalling with the president and television anchorman Tom Brokaw how he had rejected Lieutenant Ronald Reagan forty years earlier as narrator for the wartime film Your Job in Germany. Reagan had not forgotten. 'But you were right,' the president said with an engaging smile. 'John Beal did have a better voice.'")

So what are conservatives to do with Seuss? I say read him, because most of his books are incredible fun — but also choose wisely. My favorite Seuss book is one that many people don't know about: I Had Trouble in Getting to Solla Sollew (1965). Seuss may not have realized it, but the theme of Solla Sollew is powerfully conservative.

Unfortunately, it was not Seuss's most commercially successful book — sales were disappointing, even though it was written and issued during his heyday. The Morgan's describe the book this way: "a somber morality tale, a Seussian Pilgrim's Progress with the message that one can't run away from trouble." Yet it's far deeper than that. In truth, Solla Sollew is a warning against what Eric Voegelin called immanentizing the eschaton. Put in plain English: Don't seek heaven on earth.

The unnamed narrator — one of Seuss's typical cat-like creatures — joins an odd fellow on his way to the City of Solla Sollew, which is

On the banks of the beautiful River Wah-Hoo, Where they never have troubles! At least, very few. It is, in short, Utopia. Trying to reach this impossible place, the narrator embarks on a series of misadventures, including an encounter with a loony knight who bellows, "I'm General Genghis Kahn Schmitz." ("The finest line I have ever written," Seuss once said.) Ultimately, he arrives at the outskirts of Solla Sollew — but he can't get inside. It seems that a key has been lost. Everybody's locked out. Frustrated, the city's gatekeeper declares that he's had enough: And I'm off to the city of Boola Boo Ball On the banks of the beautiful River Woo-Wall, Where they never have troubles! No troubles at all! Ah, yes: a place that's even better than Utopia. By this time, of course, the narrator has caught on. He goes back home to confront his troubles rather than avoid them.

It's a wonderful book with a beautiful message — and in Seuss's liberal universe, perhaps even a subversive one.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: catinthehat; drseuss
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: KantianBurke
Bump 4 later read
61 posted on 11/21/2003 2:07:25 PM PST by CIBvet (It's about preserving OUR Borders, OUR Language and OUR American Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
I love both "The Lorax" and "The Star-bellied Sneetches". One book is about greed and a total disregard for the environment and it's inhabitants and "The Sneetches" teaches a lesson about how silly it is to hate others based on appearances. There is nothing wrong with either one of those books.
62 posted on 11/21/2003 2:11:12 PM PST by gingerky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
I'd be suspicious since it has Baldwin. Might be okay. However....
63 posted on 11/21/2003 2:11:33 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Warren_Piece
I tear up reading "The Grinch".

64 posted on 11/21/2003 2:16:16 PM PST by gingerky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
What's your question? Are you unfamiliar with the Hoover Institution?
65 posted on 11/21/2003 3:20:40 PM PST by T'wit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
Hey friend,

My statements are only extreme because I am recounting what I consider to be extreme behavior! ;-)

I am pretty certain this aspect of the Geisel's love life (a love triangle that blossomed when his first wife became very ill, and with the good old Doc doing nothing to hide the affair from his ailing wife to the point that by accounts it was cruel) is detailed in one of the Geisel bios, or in a book that peripherally discusses Geisel. I'll do some legwork for you.

I was told about the situation by a senior member of the english lit (my major) department of my college alma mater.

I am sure you are an adept Googler, but I found a corroborating account (actually includes other details I didn't mention but knew - like the almost 20 year difference in ages between Dr. S and his 2nd bride - which is only peripheral to the story really) in about 60 seconds on Google, so I may just be lucky I guess.

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=3A75F8A3.16548458%40uswest.net&rnum=4&prev=/groups%3Fq%3D%252BGeisel%2B%252B%2522first%2Bwife%2522%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D3A75F8A3.16548458%2540uswest.net%26rnum%3D4

Now granted Amy's post in the link above in a celebrity's gossip newsgroup, but it fits the account I have known since the late 1980s when I was in college. I've also known folks who know the story also over the years. I don't think it is spoken of much. I don't have much time now but I'll try and find more links on the story. I am sure they are out there.

This could also be a myth or legend that has made the rounds too, but I can say I first heard of it from someone certainly not prone to that, and who may also, I confess, have personal knowledge of it, but I can't say.
66 posted on 11/21/2003 3:51:03 PM PST by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY
If biography can't move an inch closer to explaining the green of those eggs then I'm all for the New Critics.

Or in plainer language, just because I don't smoke doesn't mean it's not a pleasure in a story.

67 posted on 11/21/2003 4:07:40 PM PST by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: cornelis
No idea what you are talking about, corny, but I'll just nod my head and hope you move on... ;-)
68 posted on 11/21/2003 5:15:06 PM PST by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY
I agree that by all accounts Geisel behaved poorly. One account I read was rather astonishing. The soon-to-be second Mrs. Geisel (Audrey) told her still-husband that she was going to marry Geisel. After thinking for a while, the husband asked her, "Who will do the driving?" Audrey said, "Why, me, of course!"

"That's ok, then," he said, "I just didn't want a wife of mine riding in a car with someone who drives like Ted does!"

Someone else I like very much as a thinker, Ayn Rand, behaved abominably in her marriage, but I don't let that turn me against her work.

One could say the same thing about a lot of people, for example, Pepys, who by all accounts screwed any woman he could get his hands on.

I don't condone the behavior but I don't let that stop me from appreciating the good things they did in their lives.
69 posted on 11/21/2003 5:33:52 PM PST by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY
Here's for starters: New Criticism Explained

The New Critics didn't think gossip had any centrality in literary evaluation, or at least, as T.S Eliot thought, that a measure of objectivity is inherently the goal of words: "The end of the enjoyment of poetry is a pure contemplation from which all accidents of personal emotion are removed." To be sure, the author above strays from this with biographical tidbits.

I'm not a purist, but then again, I think you are way off topic. : )

70 posted on 11/21/2003 5:38:04 PM PST by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: livius
Incidentally, the Cat in the Hat movie got a horrible review in the WSJ.

Just received my Entertainment Weekly and they gave it a D.

71 posted on 11/21/2003 5:39:36 PM PST by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cornelis
Oh well, I was just explaining why I didn't care for Geisel personally. Since the thread is about Geisel and his work, it is on topic.

But I started my thoughts on this thread by saying kids enjoy his work and that's good enough for me.

Geisel the man, well, is more of a louse, best as I can tell. If gossip is a part of his legacy, well, it's a part of his legacy. That is all. ;-)
72 posted on 11/21/2003 5:50:55 PM PST by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
I agree - I started by saying kids enjoy his books and thats was good enough for me.

You are correct about Rand, also.

I just like to get as complete a view of a person as I can.
73 posted on 11/21/2003 5:57:54 PM PST by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: T'wit
Yes, I have. But usually it is not associated with communists. Thomas Sowell is there. But apparently this Keresky wasn't as left-lwaning as the article implied.
74 posted on 11/21/2003 6:07:16 PM PST by nickcarraway (www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
> Yes, I have. But usually it is not associated with communists. Thomas Sowell is there. But apparently this Keresky wasn't as left-lwaning as the article implied.

No, he wasn't, but it wouldn't have mattered that much. His political background, period, would have been useful in studying the Hoover archives of Revolutionary Russian papers. And that is the whole point of Hoover, its collection of historic records. Condi Rice was at Hoover before President Bush tapped her for National Security Advisor (college degree at 19, that lady is special!). Milton Friedman is still a Hoover fellow. Joshua Muravchik, another, recently wrote a very good history of socialism, I think titled Heaven on Earth.

The Institution was a sleepy old place until a Canadian scholar named W. Glenn Campbell was named director back around, oh, 1960. He made it what it is, with much help and advice from David Packard. Herbert Hoover was still alive to endorse these changes and improvements.

75 posted on 11/21/2003 8:07:05 PM PST by T'wit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: T'wit
Eric Voegelin was there, and he is incidentally mentioned in the article above: "My favorite Seuss book is one that many people don't know about: I Had Trouble in Getting to Solla Sollew (1965). . . In truth, Solla Sollew is a warning against what Eric Voegelin called immanentizing the eschaton. Put in plain English: Don't seek heaven on earth.
76 posted on 11/21/2003 8:28:29 PM PST by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: livius; KantianBurke; armadale; narses; Land of the Irish; NYer; Salvation
Incidentally, the Cat in the Hat movie got a horrible review in the WSJ. Apparently the movie took this mildly anarchic but generally entertaining and positive book, and made it gross, brutish, and cynical. Somehow the movie even injected a bit of sex into it. So be warned if you're planning on taking your kids to it.
9 posted on 11/21/2003 10:22 AM PST by livius

I did not see the movie or the WSJ review -- but I did see a commercial advertising it on TV. That was enough to convince me that Mike Myers was playing the Cat as though he were still in an Austin Powers movie.

Apparently the Cat is gay, however.
4 posted on 11/21/2003 10:10 AM PST by armadale

Not from what I saw! ...

One scene in the commercial had the Cat with the 2 kids on each side in the living room, standing in front of a small table with a framed photo on it (we see only the back of the frame).

The Cat excitedly picks up the photo and asks, "Whoooo is this?" Simultaneously, his large red-and-white hat has an erection and expands to about 3X its size! It does not go straight up, but inclines at about a 50-degree angle! The tip looked a little funny, too!

The camera does a close-up of a framed photo of a woman. The children, off-camera, both say "That's our mother."

The Cat's hat returns to normal as he puts the photo back on the table. I don't recall the snappy reply he makes to the kids, but it's something along the lines of "Wow! She's shagadelic!" or words to that effect.

I have a pretty low opinion of Hollywood, but even I was surprised both by the fact that they would insert sexual innuendo into a Dr. Seuss story, and then be proud enough about it to put the scene into a commercial supposedly aimed at motivating parents to take their children to see the film.

Had the film been a teen date movie comedy, the commercial would have been completely understandable. As a commercial for parents and kindergarteners, it made little sense.

77 posted on 11/21/2003 8:30:26 PM PST by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cornelis
Thank you, I didn't remember that Voegelin was at Hoover. Oh, we had fun with that steamy, conspiratorial slogan: "Do not let THEM immanentize the Eschaton."

Good place for him. Only three people on earth could read his writing. I am not one of them :-)

78 posted on 11/21/2003 8:41:26 PM PST by T'wit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Dajjal
@2003 Universal Studios and Dreamworks LLC

The WonderfulPerverted World of Disney.

79 posted on 11/21/2003 8:47:55 PM PST by Land of the Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Dajjal
I saw the same scene as a Queer Eye parody, but you could be right.
80 posted on 11/22/2003 5:55:35 AM PST by armadale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson