Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Same-Sex Marriage Opponents Emboldened [Randall Terry Joins the Fight]
AP ^ | 11/21/03

Posted on 11/21/2003 6:21:43 AM PST by 11th Earl of Mar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
Oh boy! We get Randall Terry to help us!
1 posted on 11/21/2003 6:21:44 AM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Anti-abortion activist Randall Terry, who led protests against Vermont's civil unions law, said he'll set up operations in Massachusetts. He plans statewide "theatrical demonstrations," such as a Caesar-like judge holding a whip over a cowering state legislator, to illustrate what he said is lawmakers' meek acceptance to the court's power grab.

What a buffoon. His theatricality we be caricatured as a latently homosexual.


2 posted on 11/21/2003 6:24:43 AM PST by Sabertooth (No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar; MeeknMing
Queers and pedophiles won't stop ping!

""It's time that the sleeping majority woke up to what's going on," Crews said."

The next step in denying God's sovereignty over the United States will go to these nine people . .

"The question is or at least ought to be, how can such a small, godless, minority have such influence over our courts and legislative processes?"

Answer:

U.S. Supreme Court, 2003 - The Oligarchy*

(All Your Sovereignty Are Belong To Us!)

Justices of the Supreme Court

Back Row (left to right): Ginsburg, Souter, Thomas, Breyer
Front Row (left to right): Scalia, Stevens, Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy

ol•i•gar•chy
Pronunciation: 'ä-l&-"gär-kE, 'O-
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -chies
Date: 1542
1 : government by the few
2 : a government in which a small group exercises control especially for corrupt and selfish purposes; also : a group exercising such control
3 : an organization under oligarchic control

sov•er•eign•ty
Variant(s): also sov•ran•ty /-tE/
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Etymology: Middle English soverainte, from Middle French soveraineté, from Old French, from soverain
Date: 14th century
1 obsolete : supreme excellence or an example of it
2 a : supreme power especially over a body politic b : freedom from external control : AUTONOMY c : controlling influence
3 : one that is SOVEREIGN; especially : an autonomous state

3 posted on 11/21/2003 6:25:01 AM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Randall should stay home but that leaves the question of who will move the ball forward in Massachusetts. Somebody needs to step forward and rally the silent majority.
4 posted on 11/21/2003 6:28:24 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Oh boy! We get Randall Terry to help us!

Randall Terry lost all credibility when he, as a supposed man of God, abandoned his wife and children for another woman. He inserted himself into the Terri Schindler situation to get his name back in the new This is just another attempt on his part to do the same.

5 posted on 11/21/2003 6:28:50 AM PST by texgal (end no-fault divorce laws and return DUE PROCESS to our citizens))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
This will work to our advantage. As more right-leaing activists join the fight the media will label them as bigots, homophobic insensitive neanderthals and the majority of voters will think "I don't believe in gay marriage and who is calling me a bigoted homophobic insensitive neanderthal?
6 posted on 11/21/2003 6:29:10 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Oh boy! We get Randall Terry to help us!

Main Entry: adul·ter·er
Pronunciation: &-'d&l-t&r-&r
Function: noun
Date: 1513
: a person who commits adultery; especially : a man who commits adultery

7 posted on 11/21/2003 6:30:17 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
This whole aurgument is wrong. It is not a question of whether or not Homo's have a right to get married. Homosexuality is wrong, period. Do not let them change the focus.

If you're auguing that they should or shouldn't have the right to marry you've already conceeded that homosexuality is accepted, and it should not be!

8 posted on 11/21/2003 6:33:47 AM PST by sirchtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth
Have the Massachusetts Supremes ever heard of Rose Bird?
9 posted on 11/21/2003 6:45:07 AM PST by CaliforniaDreamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth
"Homosexuality is wrong, period."

But that doesn't include pedophiles, right?

MICHAEL JACKSON WITH HIS FAVORITE MAGAZINE

WHATS THE SIMILARITY BETWEEN MICHAEL JACKSON AND A BIG SALE AT JC PENNYS?

LITTLE BOYS PANTS ARE HALF OFF EVERY WEEKEND!




10 posted on 11/21/2003 6:45:18 AM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth
Do not let them change the focus.

The "focus" changed years ago when queers became "gay". And more queers (I'm referring to queer men) were shown on TV and the focus was on their personality. They became "funny" and "good at fashion". The focus was put on the emotional aspect of queer relationships. All the reasons "Queer Eye for The Straight Guy" is a popular TV program. Which to me is a chicken$hit show because it does not do anything but promote the self-parody that has been pushed by those promoting male homosexuality for years now. Which are "gay activists" along with the "gays" in the entertainment media which has an unnatural number of queers in it's employ.

The "focus" was taken away from the reality of what queer men "do". Which is have anal and oral sex. Even queer men kissing is not shown much on TV. Why not? Or queer men humping under the covers "ala" what you see on any "hetro" soap opera on any given day? Why not? It's because it's not a natural thing. And repulsive to most people. Most "straight people" don't have "An Eye For What the Queer Guy Does". Physically.

As I've posted before, I've known a lot of queer men. I found them to be mostly self-loathing and unhappy people. Which makes sense since the vast majority of the planet is not like them nor wishes to be. And finds what they "do" repulsive. I know one thing, most of the queer men I've met won't be happy unless all men become queer. That won't be happening. So, instead, they will continue to use the courts to make those unlike them accept them.

Marriage for queers is a dumb idea. For many reasons but mainly because it makes something unnatural natural.

11 posted on 11/21/2003 6:58:49 AM PST by isthisnickcool (Guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
It has never been about marriage per se. It is about normalizing deviance.

ALL the claims they make can be acieved for under 200.00 dollars with some form legal documents. This is about imposing publicly their private sexual behavior.

Marriage is a PUBLIC institution. The right to have sex in any deviant manner in private does not constitute their public acceptance.

The stated next goal is eliminating the age of consent. Homosexuals want access to children. (see jackson)
12 posted on 11/21/2003 7:18:07 AM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe; 11th Earl of Mar; *Homosexual Agenda
Fagachussetts/Gay short-lived victory, long term Loser bump ! ...

Just as New York City's Stonewall Riots of 1969 stirred the equal-rights movement for gays, critics of the court's ruling hope it awakens the movement to block same-sex marriage.

The Rev. Louis Sheldon of the Traditional Values Coalition in Washington predicted the ruling is such a radical example of judicial overreach that new laws prohibiting gay marriage will be passed in response.

"It's only for a few moments that (gay marriage proponents) will have the victory," he said.

barf alert!


MICHAEL STUPARYK/TORONTO STAR

Michael Stark, left, and Michael Lashner pop champagne
and kiss after their wedding ceremony yesterday.
Leshner called the ruling, "Day One for millions of gays
and lesbians around the world."

Gay couple married after ruling
(Toronto, Canada)

B.C. court OK's gay marriage -
first gay couple legally married in British Columbia

Gays Flock to Divorce Court

Same-sex unions in 'News' -
Dallas Morning News to publish FREE
same sex unions announcements

The Media's Gay Mafia "Queers" the News

Useful Idiot Caption-A-Rama: Special Gay Pride Edition!

Gay frat seeks approval from UT-San Antonio
(See #39 for some humor)


13 posted on 11/21/2003 7:43:14 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (http://richard.meek.home.comcast.net/SorosClintoon.JPG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
Watch Queer as Folk if you wanna see guys doing it :-P...
14 posted on 11/21/2003 7:59:39 AM PST by fiscally_right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
So, instead, they will continue to use the courts to make those unlike them accept them.

They're whipped by their own desires, but rather than admit it, they want us to join them in the pretense that they can never do otherwise. Perverting the law is part of this program, and so is suppressing news of ex-homosexuals.

15 posted on 11/21/2003 8:08:28 AM PST by thulldud (It's bad luck to be superstitious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
As I've posted before, I've known a lot of queer men. I found them to be mostly self-loathing and unhappy people.

They are unhappy because they chose to act on something that is selfishly wrong.

The self-loathing comes from how perverted they realize their acts are.

The homo activist are the ones that want to make PERVERSION, not homosexuals acceptable...they want to try to force people to accept perversion as an acceptable lifestyle, it's not, and it will never be.

It's a little reaasuring that the overwhelming majority will not accept these perverted acts as normal...

16 posted on 11/21/2003 8:16:39 AM PST by sirchtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fiscally_right
Watch Queer as Folk if you wanna see guys doing it :-P...

That must be on Showtime or another cable channel I don't get. I'd pass anyway. Not something I "wanna" see.

17 posted on 11/21/2003 8:23:55 AM PST by isthisnickcool (Guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Randall Terry as a crusader to save the institution of marriage? What a riot! At least as an anti-abortion crusader, he could honestly claim never to have had one.
18 posted on 11/21/2003 9:16:21 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
Yep, showtime
19 posted on 11/21/2003 10:16:25 AM PST by fiscally_right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
A few of the sponsors and supporters of the Defense of Marriage act were divorced. I remember the talk shows making lots of jokes.

"________ said he voted for the bill to defend the sanctity of all 3 of his marriages"
20 posted on 11/21/2003 10:18:33 AM PST by fiscally_right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson