Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sirchtruth
Do not let them change the focus.

The "focus" changed years ago when queers became "gay". And more queers (I'm referring to queer men) were shown on TV and the focus was on their personality. They became "funny" and "good at fashion". The focus was put on the emotional aspect of queer relationships. All the reasons "Queer Eye for The Straight Guy" is a popular TV program. Which to me is a chicken$hit show because it does not do anything but promote the self-parody that has been pushed by those promoting male homosexuality for years now. Which are "gay activists" along with the "gays" in the entertainment media which has an unnatural number of queers in it's employ.

The "focus" was taken away from the reality of what queer men "do". Which is have anal and oral sex. Even queer men kissing is not shown much on TV. Why not? Or queer men humping under the covers "ala" what you see on any "hetro" soap opera on any given day? Why not? It's because it's not a natural thing. And repulsive to most people. Most "straight people" don't have "An Eye For What the Queer Guy Does". Physically.

As I've posted before, I've known a lot of queer men. I found them to be mostly self-loathing and unhappy people. Which makes sense since the vast majority of the planet is not like them nor wishes to be. And finds what they "do" repulsive. I know one thing, most of the queer men I've met won't be happy unless all men become queer. That won't be happening. So, instead, they will continue to use the courts to make those unlike them accept them.

Marriage for queers is a dumb idea. For many reasons but mainly because it makes something unnatural natural.

11 posted on 11/21/2003 6:58:49 AM PST by isthisnickcool (Guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: isthisnickcool
It has never been about marriage per se. It is about normalizing deviance.

ALL the claims they make can be acieved for under 200.00 dollars with some form legal documents. This is about imposing publicly their private sexual behavior.

Marriage is a PUBLIC institution. The right to have sex in any deviant manner in private does not constitute their public acceptance.

The stated next goal is eliminating the age of consent. Homosexuals want access to children. (see jackson)
12 posted on 11/21/2003 7:18:07 AM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: isthisnickcool
Watch Queer as Folk if you wanna see guys doing it :-P...
14 posted on 11/21/2003 7:59:39 AM PST by fiscally_right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: isthisnickcool
So, instead, they will continue to use the courts to make those unlike them accept them.

They're whipped by their own desires, but rather than admit it, they want us to join them in the pretense that they can never do otherwise. Perverting the law is part of this program, and so is suppressing news of ex-homosexuals.

15 posted on 11/21/2003 8:08:28 AM PST by thulldud (It's bad luck to be superstitious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: isthisnickcool
As I've posted before, I've known a lot of queer men. I found them to be mostly self-loathing and unhappy people.

They are unhappy because they chose to act on something that is selfishly wrong.

The self-loathing comes from how perverted they realize their acts are.

The homo activist are the ones that want to make PERVERSION, not homosexuals acceptable...they want to try to force people to accept perversion as an acceptable lifestyle, it's not, and it will never be.

It's a little reaasuring that the overwhelming majority will not accept these perverted acts as normal...

16 posted on 11/21/2003 8:16:39 AM PST by sirchtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson