Replies

it seems to me a different matter altogether for the lawyer to HIDE a crime (attempted murder) from the court, and to misrepresent plain facts in order, in effect, to FINISH the murder. That's going a long way past representing a scoundrel. That's being a knowing accessory to the crime. Can you comment?

This reminds me of the case in California....the attorneys who defended the man who killed the little girl last year in the summer. O'Reilly brought up this similar issue of misrepresenting, intentionally, "facts." These kinds of things would have to be brought before the State Bar.....which means, you will have other lawyers, and judges, sitting in judgment on lawyers. Yes, they do this, but I would say it's less likely that they will do anything about what Felos has done/is doing.

I know lawyers are probably more likely to be investigated/disbarred over overt and flagrant violations of criminal laws, i.e., stalking/shootings, etc. I know a lawyer from Colorado who was disbarred for not paying child support and other domestic issues (fairly serious) with his ex-wife.....who, I also knew. IMHO, she was taunting him. He was not pristine, either.

How willing do you think the Florida Bar (the other good ol' boys) will be to go after Felos? What "proof" do we have that he actually "knows" anything? This would be a logical assumption/likelihood, but, right now, that's all the charge could be.

Hi, there! Thanks for your input. Does it make any difference that this crime is not yet "completed", the would-be victim is not yet murdered? Is there any leverage over Felos in any of this?

What was so painful about being there at the hospice when Terri's tube was out -- was that I was watching a horrible crime unfold before my eyes, a slow murder was being committed! It was like watching a mugging in NYC -- just standing by, wondering why someone wasn't doing something. (sigh) I'm speaking from the heart here.

I am so thankful to know that so many good people are working on this w/Jeb, terrisfight, federal, even around the world as KDub said earlier. I know that God is looking out for Terri as we do all we see to do.

What "proof" do we have that he actually "knows" anything? This would be a logical assumption/likelihood, but, right now, that's all the charge could be.

Well, there's something downright fishy about the fact that Felos is or has been paid by both Michael and Terri, and the fact that he has some well-established motives of his own related to this case. I would think that there are some pretty abundantly clear conflicts of interest, and lawyers are not supposed to accept clients when doing so would create such conflicts.