[cyn]

Hi, there! Thanks for your input. Does it make any difference that this crime is not yet "completed", the would-be victim is not yet murdered? Is there any leverage over Felos in any of this?

What was so painful about being there at the hospice when Terri's tube was out -- was that I was watching a horrible crime unfold before my eyes, a slow murder was being committed! It was like watching a mugging in NYC -- just standing by, wondering why someone wasn't doing something. (sigh) I'm speaking from the heart here.

I am so thankful to know that so many good people are working on this w/Jeb, terrisfight, federal, even around the world as KDub said earlier. I know that God is looking out for Terri as we do all we see to do.

[nicmarlo]

I don't know what all the laws/rules of procedure are in Florida. And I am not a lawyer, so I don't know what the "ethics" specifically are that Felos may/may not have actually violated.

But, absent actual documents, how would one prove what Felos "knew"? He could easily get around "knowing" things by instructing Mikhell not to write anything down that would incriminate either himself or Felos. Then there's the confidentiality of work product between a lawyer and his/her client....it would have to be subpoenaed---but to get that, you'd have to have a judge inclined to issue an order to investigate Felos. Then, there's shredder machines, so handy at one time for the Klintoon Whitewater crimes.

I have no doubt that Felos is doing wrong....but how would one prove this, that's the question.

[Wampus SC]

"Does it make any difference that this crime is not yet "completed", the would-be victim is not yet murdered? Is there any leverage over Felos in any of this?"

Could a lawyer be called an accomplice in those circumstances?